Evidence of Pentagon and
military officials complicity in 9/11 events and participation along with 9/11
Commission authors in an obvious cover-up.
Fl 77 Pentagon Boeing 757
Original FAA/NORAD Time Line
and later upgraded to air threat conference dealing with
all “planes of interest”
turned off or are not responding to radio.
as the trip takes less than 15 minutes.
told that a second hijacked plane had hit WTC2.
But he gave several versions
of the call and said that the call was collect from a plane air phone because
she did not have a credit card,
which is not possible.
White House operation center
with V.P. Cheney, also indicated he took part in this
decision.
Note: General Richard Myers,
commander of U.S. Forces, and the NORAD spokesman Mike Snyder both originally
reported that no jets
were scrambled by the military until after the Pentagon
was hit. After considerable criticism of
an apparent military stand down, the new report
was issued indicating that FAA notified NORAD at
After more criticism of both
earlier scenarios as implying a military stand down, the 9/11 Commission
revised the time line and official scenario
again in 2004, stating that the Pentagon was unaware that
there was a plane heading towards D.C. until it was hit. And that the earlier report
that planes had been scrambled to intercept Flight 77 were
in error. [this
is clearly contradicted by considerable testimony and evidence]
New Revised 9/11 Commission
Time Line(2004)
8::38 FAA contacts NORAD that Fl 11 hijacked, NORAD spends 8
minutes on calls up chain of command
9: 21 FAA reported to NORAD that Flight 11
did not hit WTC1 and is headed towards D.C.
and fly out to sea far away from D.C.
9:38 plane hits Pentagon;
NORAD never notified that plane was headed to D.C., Pentagon notified only 2
minutes before building was hit
The new revised 9/11 Comm.
Scenario for Fl 77 said that the previous report of course changes and turning around(as also reported by news reports)
were wrong and that the FAA was not aware that the plane
had turned around and was heading towards D.C.
So the plane flew undetected towards
aware that the plane was hijacked. The Commission said that earlier reports and
statements that NORAD was notified about the Fl 175 and Fl 77
hijackings were in error.
The Comm. Said that the real reason that the
that Flight 11 that had earlier been reported to have hit
WTC1 was actually still in the air and
heading towards D.C. They were aware of
this new
report for the first
time in 2004 and used it to correct the time line. The Comm. said however that it was unable to
identify the source of the report
or who took the report.
The Comm. Said that at
towards D.C., the planes were still 105 miles away because
the pilots had misunderstood their instructions and headed east out to sea.
[Flight Controllers at FAA
who were monitoring Flight 11 had stated to reporters that they never lost
sight of Fl 11 and watched it all the way to
WTC1 and were aware of the
crash, which
was reported to all regional offices- so it is not known why the military and
Comm. Were confused about this.
There is considerable
evidence contradicting the 9/11 Comm. Revised time line and scenario.
1.
Journalist Tom Flocco reported in 2003 that Laura Brown of FAA said that a
phone bridge between the FAA and Charles Leidig of
NMCC
had begun
between
Fl
11 was hijacked but was upgraded later to an air threat call dealing with all
“planes of interest”. A source at the
Dept. of Transportation
confirmed
the
[Later
after controversy and a conversation with her supervisors, Laura Brown emailed
that she wanted to revise her time estimate of the
start of
the earlier bridge call from
started
at the earlier time]
2.
Laura
Brown(senior FAA official at Boston Logan) (memo of
communication from just after the first WTC crash and prior to the WTC2 crash(since
approx.
that they
were talking about “all flights of interest”.
3.
Matthew Wald, NY Times published story supports the Laura Brown version of the call. It reported that
according to his sources:
“During
the hour that the Fl 77 was under the control of the hijackers, up to the
moment it struck the west side of the Pentagon, military
officials
in a command center on the
about
what to do” (the command center is the NMCC and air
traffic control is FAA)
4.
Statement by Captain M. Jellinik, NORAD command
director on 9/11, According to news
reports quoting him, a bridge call between
NMCC,
NORAD, and FAA began just after the first strike on the WTC, consistent with the time of the original
Laura Brown memo.
5.
According to a
report by Richard Clark, National Security Coordinator: He reported that the deputy director of the
White House Situation Room
told him
at
as a
significant event call and had been upgraded to an air threat call, and there
had been many exchanges of information.
According to Clarke,
the FAA head
Jane Garvey was at the White House teleconference answering questions about the
hijackings before
6.
The Commission
report said that it could not determine who from DOD participated in the
teleconference with Clark and the FAA;
however
Richard Clarke had testified that Gen
Myers and Donald Rumsfeld and Jane Garvey were on the
call. Others confirm this.
Norman
Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, said he met with
Richard Clark who was on a conference call before going to the
White House PEOC room to meet with V.P. Cheney at
7.
Norman Mineta, Sec. of
Transportation, testimony before 9/11
Comm.: on a meeting he was at with V.P. Cheney at the White House PEOC
that he
arrived at about
“During
the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man
who would come in and say to the vice president,
“The
plane is 50 miles out”; “The plane is 30 miles out” ; And when it got down to “the plane is 10
miles out” the young man said to the
vice
president, “Do the orders still
stand?” And the Vice President turned
and whipped his neck around and said “Of course the orders
still
stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
[This
documents that the military command was monitoring the plane, and some say that
a decision was clearly made to not intercept it or shoot
it down
with missiles. This testimony by Mineta and that of
Discrepancies in General
Myers and Donald Rumsfeld’s statements
The 9/11 Commission Report
apparently tries to deflect the criticism that Gen Myers complicit in the stand
down by stating that Gen Myers
was on Capital Hill meeting with Senator Cleland from
and the Pentagon buildings were attacked. Thus he never took part in dealing with 9/11
events. [But some have stated this is
strange behavior
for the commander of
Also this statement is
contradicted by the report and testimony of Richard Clarke, the National
Security Director. He said that Myers, Rumsfeld,
Tenet, Muller, and Garvey
were on a teleconference call about the attacks and that he had a discussion
with Gen Myers about getting fighters up
over
the DC air national guard(DCANG). This also contradicts Gen Myers statements to
the effect that Andrews AFB had no planes on alert to defend
the D.C. area. One
of these men clearly isn’t telling the truth, and given the number of people on
the teleconference call it is easy to confirm who it is.
Shortly after 9/11, Sec of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld made a statement carried by
news reports and on the DOD web site about his actions on 9/11.
Apparently he was also
anxious to imply that he had not been aware of the 9/11 events before the
buildings were hit. He said that he
heard
something happened and went downstairs to see what happened and
was told a plane had hit the Pentagon (he was in the East wing, plane
hit the west wing which is a considerable distance away).
He said he went to the crash site and helped with putting people on stretchers
for
loading in ambulances and returned to his office at about
that when the plane hit the Pentagon shook and he went out
to see what had happened. He said he
wasn’t there long and returned to his office
at about
The 9/11 Comm. agreed with
the first report regarding actions and with the 2nd statement
regarding the time of return to the office. But note the
time that the plane hit and the fact that it is about a 10
minute walk from Rumsfeld’s office in the East wing
to the west wing parking lot. Also
there is contradictory testimony to any of these
statements.
All of these statements are
in conflict with Richard Clarke’s report, which is easily verifiable. Clarke said that Myers and Rumsfeld were on the
teleconference call with him and others about the hijackings from
about
that smoke was getting into the secure conference room so
he moved to another studio at the Pentagon.
This contradicts Rumsfeld’s statements
on where he was and what he was doing. It also contradicts Myers and Rumsfeld’s statements that they were unaware of the status of Fl 77
before it hit the Pentagon.
The Comm. Report appears to
be an obvious attempt to cover up these discrepancies by not looking at or reporting
information from
testimony that was not consistence with the statements of
Cheney, Myers, Rumsfeld, and other top DOD and
military leaders. The testimony
of Transportation Secretary who was in charge of all
response to the non military response to the hijackings , and the testimony of
National Security Coordinator
Richard Clarke, that of many FBI agents such as Sibel
Edmunds and
included or mentioned in the Comm. Report. The FBI agents testified that they were aware
of prior warnings of the plans for the attacks and
that they and others had warned the administration and
pentagon officials, and also that their efforts prior to 9/11 to prevent the
attacks were
stifled by FBI top level officials. Although the Commission Report says that the
Pentagon only became aware of the plane heading to the
Pentagon at
contradictory to this statement besides the previous reports and
testimony. The Comm. Report says that
the Pentagon became aware of an
unarmed military C 130H cargo plane in the
the plane, identified
it as a Boeing 757, attempted to follow its path, and reported that it crashes
into the Pentagon. Rather a lot of action in an
extremely short time period when talking to a C130 pilot would
not be high on official’s agenda. This
is the primary source identifying that
the plane that hit the Pentagon was a Boeing 757. Besides the obvious time complications, this
story does not seem to be compatible with
another story in the Commission Report about the plane that
hit the Pentagon’s approach and actions.
And another strange story of this
C 130H being involved in
This information come from
Chap 14 of the
book of Dr. D.R. Griffin, The 9/11
Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions;
the book has references for the sources of information
quoted.
The plane hit the Pentagon 1
hour and 35 minutes after Flight 11 was reported to be hijacked; 52 minutes
after WTC1 was hit; 48
minutes after
Flight 77 was reported by FAA
to be off course and with no radio contact; and 42 minutes after a plane was
reported to be headed towards D.C.
Physical Evidence of Cordite
Explosion and Complicity of some Officials at Pentagon
(Evidence of Explosives in Pentagon Attack)
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/index.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/conclusions/explosion.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/index.html
Suppression of Evidence and
Cover-up by officials regarding Pentagon crash
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/missing.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/footage.html
FAA Radar showed Flight 77 could not have hit the Pentagon:
http://www.the-movement.com/air%20operation/Flight77.htm
Implications of the Part of
the Pentagon Struck on September 11th http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/location.html
Pentagon Videos Obvious Fakes
to Cause Confusion,
but fire color(white & red) not consistent with gasoline
fire http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/videoframes.html
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/pages-en/im-2ndlev.html
Pentagon Photos http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/photos/index.html
Indestructible Pentagon lamp
poles survived Boeing crash?
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate45.htm
Pentagon collapse caused by
cutting charges
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate46.htm
Pentagon Conclusions:
