Evidence of Pentagon and
military officials complicity in 9/11 events and participation along with 9/11
Commission authors in an obvious cover-up.
Flight 175 9/11 Commission’s Revised Time Line
(2004)
NORAD time line for Flight
175- released
told that a second hijacked plane had hit WTC2.
Note: The impact with
WTC2 was 43 minutes after Flight 11 first went off course, 21 minutes after
Flight 175 went off course, and 17 minutes after the
Given this time line it is
clear that there was sufficient time for jets to intercept and prevent the
attack, and the military received considerable accusations of appearance of a
stand-down.
1.
Journalist Tom Flocco reported in 2003 that Laura Brown of FAA said that a
phone bridge between the FAA and Charles Leidig of
NMCC had begun about
2.
NORAD
employee Lt. Colonel Dawne Deskins
later says that
Boston flight control notifies NORAD of Flight 11's hijacking at
3.
Jets were
scrambled from Otis AFB in
4.
There were closer
AFBs in
5.
News reports
quoting the officer on duty at Otis AFB, Major James Fox, said that the
specific target location was not known so the planes were sent in the general
direction of
6.
Given the
questions regarding why the jets did not intercept Flight 175, the 9/11
Commission Report stated that the pilots were not given directions to the
target and “were vectored towards military-controlled airspace off
7.
White House Secret Service has a permanent connection to FAA after Flight 11
hit WTC1, approx.
Revisions
in Time Line by 9/11 Commission:
The
9/11 Commission Report tries to alleviate the indications of a stand-down
raised by the previous NORAD time line by publishing a new time line for events(3 years later).
In
the new time line the report states that the previous time line was wrong and
the FAA had never reported the second hijacking to the military and the planes
headed for
The
new 9/11 Commission revision also said that when the FAA flight controller
tried to report the hijacking to their supervisor, the supervisor refused to
talk to the controller. Then at
The
Commission Report also contains a paragraph where it is stated that the planes
did not take off at
All
of these statements contradict the earlier statements of General Myers and Mike
Snyder, spokesman for NORAD, that no planes were scrambled until the Pentagon
was hit.
New
York Mayor Giuliani said that President Bush deputy political director Chris
Henrick stated that fighter jets had been sent to
So
no matter what is true regarding the military jet response, it is clear that
military officials stated many intentional falsehoods and contradictory
statements to the 9/11 Commission.
There
were 5 reports that were contrary to the 9/11 Commission Reports revised time
line and events description.
According
to a memo of
The
FAA and military and NORAD had been in constant communication from just after
the first WTC crash and prior to the WTC2 crash(since
about
Journalist
Tom Flocco reported that in 2003 Laura Brown of FAA said that a phone bridge
between the FAA and Charles Leidig of NMCC had begun between
A
source at the Dept. of Transportation confirmed the
[Later
after discussion with her supervisors, Laura Brown emailed that she wanted to
revise her time estimate of the start of the earlier bridge call from 8;20 to
Tom
Flocco states that in his opinion the majority of the evidence supports that
the first bridge started
during the
The
4th report was Captain M. Jellinik, NORAD command director on
9/11. According to news reports in 2002
quoting him, a bridge call between NMCC, NORAD, and FAA began just after the
first strike on the WTC, consistent with the time of the original Laura Brown
memo.
The
5th report was from Richard Clark, National Security Coordinator,. He reported that the deputy director of the White House
Situation Room told him at
All
of the reports are inconsistent with the 9/11 Commission revised time line and
statements about events regarding Flight 175.
The
source of this information is Chapter 13 of Dr. D.R. Griffin’s book which has
references for the items discussed here.
The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions
& Paul Thompson’s Timeline http://billstclair.com/911timeline/main/flight175.html
At
http://www.team8plus.org/content.php?article.17
Physical Evidence of
Controlled Demolition and Complicity at WTC2
There is considerable evidence that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition.(I) Steel framed buildings have never before or since been caused to collapse by airplane impacts or fires. And there is strong evidence supporting massive explosions in the towers, with statements by firefighters, building engineers, janitors, and others who said they heard and saw explosions. The degree of pulverization of the solids in the buildings and outward forceful expulsion of unusually fine powder also is consistent with explosives. And the collapses of WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 were all consistent with the characteristics of controlled demolition, with implosion and rapid collapse. Also the splintering of the massive steel beams and the molten metal and hot temperatures in the building debris for over 2 months also does not appear consistent with gravity related damage or gasoline related fires since the gasoline fires lasted less than 10 minutes and the fires in WTC2 were never very large or hot. (III)
There has also been a major effort
to suppress virtually all evidence of what really happened at the World Trade
Center through failure to public ally release the flight recorder information
or evidence of plane parts, rapid
contracting for removal of steel beams and other evidence without giving
independent investigators access to the evidence, gag orders on firefighters,
etc. There has also been a major effort
to cover up the large number of warnings, many very explicit of 9/11 type events
in the fall of 2001 and the large number of explicit warnings given to the FAA
and airlines prior to 9/11. (II)
I. Evidence of
Controlled Demolition of WTC Buildings
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/index.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/index.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/towers.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/surviving.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/proofs/index.html
2. Reports from Firefighters at the Impact Zone Inside the
South Tower- small controllable fires in
South Tower http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/audiotape.html
3. Solid materials in WTC2 pulverized by massive explosions
WTC 2 top pulverized from below
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate11.htm
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/mushrooming.html
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate12.htm
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate13.htm
What caused the huge fireball on the north side of the
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate34.htm
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate35.htm
Where did the plane go that hit the
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate37.htm
http://home.debitel.net/user/andreas.bunkahle/plate39.htm
4. Molten Metal & Fires in the WTC Rubble
That Persisted for Months
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/rubblefires.html
http://www.seau.org/SEAUNews-2001-10.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/radio/youreyesdontlie/index.html
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/wtc.htm
5. Implausible
Pancake Theories not supported by the evidence
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/official/index.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/mushrooming.html
II. Official Actions:
Disappearance of Evidence, Evidence Suppression, Farcical Investigations
1. http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/official.html http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/evidence.html http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/investigation.html
Dr. D.R. Griffin
books: The New
Omissions and
Distortions, 2004
2. Cover-up of Many prior warnings with some
very explicit of 9/11 type Events
http://www.flcv.com/warnings.html
http://www.flcv.com/911hist.html