Immune Reactive Conditions: The mercury connection to inflammatory and immune reactive conditions (asthma, eczema,  lupus, Scleroderma, celiac, chrons, allergies,etc.)           

I. Increasing Incidence of Inflammatory, Immune Reactive Conditions

 

The incidence of allergic and immune reactive conditions such as allergies, asthma, eczema, lupus, psoriasis,  etc. have been increasing rapidly in the United States over the last decade(1-4).  The prevalence of asthma doubled over the last decade(4) to approximately 31 million, 11.5% of the total population(2).  At least 50 million have allergies(19%)(3), and the largest increase has been in infants(1-4), with approximately 10 % of infants- approximately 15 million in the U.S. with systemic eczema(1). Approximately 12% have had chronic sinusitis(3c). Many studies have found exposure to mercury and other heavy metals to be common causes of such conditions as will be shown in this paper.

 

II. Oral Metal Exposures from Dental Materials and Oral Effects

The largest source of exposure to the metals that will be shown to commonly cause inflammatory, immune reactive conditions is from dental metals.  Having dissimilar metals in the teeth, e.g.- amalgam(mercury,copper,tin,silver), gold alloys(gold,palladium), nickel or stainless steel crowns(nickel,cobalt) causes galvanic electrical currents, and much higher  mercury vapor levels in oral air and metal levels in oral tissues. (101-110).    Government agencies and medical studies have found that the largest source of mercury exposure in most people is from dental amalgam fillings(122-130). For those with amalgam dental fillings, exposure from fillings amounts to from 50 to 90 percent of exposure, with the average being about 75 % of total exposure (123,125‑130). Mercury is an unusual metal commonly a liquid at room temperature and vaporizing to a gas from its liquid or solid states.  The studies found that mercury amalgams are unstable due to mercury's vaporization and galvanic action(101-110), leaking mercury vapor continuously into the lungs and saliva at levels exceeding government health standards(110,122,124,126).  Dental amalgam is also a major source of methyl mercury exposure for many since oral and intestinal mercury is methylized by oral bacteria and other methyl donars(121,130). The other most common sources of mercury exposure are methyl mercury from fish or mercury thimerosal from vaccines, which is a major source of exposure mostly for infants or those frequently receiving flu shots(113).

 The amount of mercury released into saliva has been found by large studies to be about 1.5 to 1.9 micrograms per liter for each additional amalgam filling (116), resulting in an increase of about 1 microgram per liter in urine(125) and even higher levels excreted in feces(128). Average mercury levels in gum tissue near amalgam fillings are over 100 ppm, and are the result of flow of mercury into the mucous membrane because of galvanic currents with the mucous membrane serving as cathode and amalgam metals as anode(101,104,105,114). Concentrations of mercury in oral mucosa for a population of patients with 6 or more amalgam fillings taken during oral surgery were 20 times the level of controls(114).  Amalgam also releases significant amounts of silver, tin, and copper which also have toxic effects, with organic tin compounds formed in the body being even more neurotoxic than organic mercury.


Mercury and other metals accumulate in the oral cavity in fibroblasts, macrophages, and multinuclear giant cells of connective tissue, in blood vessel walls, along nerve sheath fibres, in basement-membranes of mucosal epithelium, striated muscle fibres, along collagen bundles and elastic tissue, in acini of salivary glands, and in tooth roots and jaw bones(104,105). Such mercury including that in the commonly formed amalgam tattoos moves to other parts of the body over time in significant amounts and more rapidly than the other metals. Macrophages remove mercury by phagocytosis and the mercury moves to other parts of the body through the blood and along nerves. Oral galvanism, where electric currents caused by mixed metals in the mouth take the metals into the gums and oral mucosa, results in accumulating mercury and other dental metals at the base of teeth with large amalgam fillings or metal crowns over amalgam base(101-111).  Such metals are documented to cause local and systemic lesions and health effects such as inflamed tissues, metal mouth, discomfort, tooth pain, gingivitis, and oral lichen planus(102-107,111,15,16,39-43).  Most usually improve from these conditions after removal of amalgam fillings and/or the amalgam tattoos by surgery(102,106,107,109,73b,126,127,15,16,39-43).  The high levels of accumulated mercury also are dispersed to other parts of the body.   Some studies have also found persons with chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields(EMF) to have higher levels of mercury exposure and excretion(117,118). Such fields are known to induce current in metals and would increase the effects of galvanism..

 

III. Mechanisms by Which Mercury and Heavy Metals Cause Chronic Inflammatory Conditions

Metals like mercury bind to SH-groups(sulfhydryl) in sulfur compounds like amino acids

and proteins, changing the structure of the compound that it is attached to.  This often results in suppression of the immune system and in the immune systems T-cells not recognizing them as appropriate nutrients and attacking them(78,18) with chronic exposure resulting in autoimmunity.  Such binding and autoimmune damage has also been documented in collagen(18).   Metals by binding to SH radicals in proteins and other such groups can cause autoimmunity by modifying proteins which via T-cells activate B-cells that target the altered proteins inducing autoimmunity as well as causing aberrant MHC II expression on altered target cells(81de). 

Mercury and other toxic metals cause release of inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha(TNFa) and Interleukin-4 (47), which will be documented to be factors in the chronic inflammatory conditions discussed here, including asthma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Scleroderma, celiac and chron’s disease, etc.   Studies have demonstrated that low concentrations of mercury(HgCl2,ie, 10(-9)-10(-15) M) significantly enhanced chemiluminescence, as well as stimulated H2O2 production by polymorphonuclear leukocytes(137). These studies clearly demonstrate the ability of extremely low levels of HgCl2 not only to suppress various PMN  leukocyte functions involved in host defense, but also to stimulate reactive oxygen metabolism(137,95). In vivo, these HgCl2 effects would not only compromise host defense but also promote tissue injury via the local production of reactive oxygen metabolites.  This has been demonstrated increase effects of factors in cardiovascular disease and neurological disease.  Melatonin, vitamin E, and vitamin C have been found to counter these adverse effects(95a).

HgCl2 induces a protein kinase C-dependent Ca2+ influx through L-type calcium channels(65acd). The calcium/calcineurin-dependent pathway and protein kinase C activation are both implicated in HgCl2-induced IL-4 gene expression; and  HgCl2 can activate directly protein kinase C, which is one of the main intracellular targets for HgCl2.  Inorganic mercury exposure results in T cell polyclonal activation and the expansion of pathogenic autoreactive anti-class II Th2 cells .  These cells produce interleukin (IL)-4 and induce a B cell polyclonal activation that is responsible for autoimmune disease. These effects of HgCl2 appear to be independent of antigen-specific recognition.


Na(+),K(+)-ATPase is a transmembrane protein that transports sodium and potassium ions across cell membranes during an activity cycle that uses the energy released by ATP hydrolysis.  Mercury, nickel, aluminum, and other toxic metals  are documented to inhibit Na(+),K(+)-ATPase function at very low levels of exposure(94,97,65). Studies have found that in asthma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Scleroderma, celiac/chron’s/IBS, and eczema cases there was a reduction in serum magnesium and red blood cell(RBC) membrane Na(+)-K+ ATPase activity and an elevation in plasma serum digoxin  (87-90,65).   The activity of some free-radical scavenging enzymes, concentration of glutathione decreased significantly, while the concentration of serum lipid peroxidation products and nitric oxide increased.  The inhibition of Na+-K+ ATPase can contribute to increase in intracellular calcium and decrease in magnesium, which can result in 1) defective neurotransmitter transport mechanism, 2) neuronal degeneration and apoptosis, 3) mitochondrial dysfunction, 4) defective golgi body function and protein processing dysfunction.  It is documented that mercury and toxic metals are common causes of  these conditions (22,30,29,47-50,65,87-90,95,96,98,28,etc.) A study found that 39% of a group of chron’s disease patients tested were immune reactive to nickel (100).

   Studies have also found mercury and lead cause autoantibodies to neuronal proteins and neurofilaments, (18,79ag,80,82).   The thymus gland plays a significant part in the establishment of the immune system and lymphatic system from the 12th week of gestation until puberty.   Inhibition of thymus function can thus affect proper development of the immune and lymphatic systems.  Lymphocyte differentiation, maturation and peripheral functions are affected by the thymic protein hormone thymulin. Mercury at very low concentrations has been seen to impair some lymphocytic functions causing subclinical manifestations in exposed workers. Animal studies have shown mercury significantly inhibits thymulin production at very low micromolar levels of exposure(131).    The metal allergens mercuric chloride and nickel sulfate were found to stimulate DNA synthesis of both immature and mature thymocytes at low levels of exposure, so chronic exposure can have long term effects(132).  Nickel in stainless steel braces and crowns is a source of reactivity and autoimmunity along with gold and palladium in crowns(32bc,16-18) Also, micromolar levels of mercuric ions specifically blocked synthesis of ribosomal RNA, causing fibrillarin relocation from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm in epithelial cells as a  consequence of the blockade of ribosomal RNA synthesis(133,81e).  This appears to be a factor in deregulation of basic cellular events and in autoimmunity caused by mercury.     There were specific immunotoxic and biochemical alterations in lymphoid organs of mice treated at the lower doses of mercury. The immunological defects were consistent with altered T-cell function as evidenced by decreases in both T-cell mitogen and mixed leukocyte responses.   Mercury caused increased immunoreactivity for glial fibrillary protein at 1 nanamole (0.2 ppb) concentration, and microglial response at even lower levels(134).   There was a particular association between the T-cell defects and inhibition of thymic pyruvate kinase, the rate-limiting enzyme for glycolysis(135).   Pyruvate and glycolysis problems are often seen in mercury toxic children being treated for autism(136). 

One mechanism of mercury’s affect on contact sensitivities is the inhibition of glutathione S- transferase(92), which is a modulator of inflamation. Mercury also causes intestinal damage and leaky gut, causing metabolic damage and increasing food sensitivities(93).  Inorganic mercury was found to be a cause of systemic eczema and digestive problems by a  Japanese study(15). 


Many studies including patch tests and immune reactivity tests have been carried out to assess the level of mercury sensitivity in different populations. They have found  that there is a significant portion of the population that are reactive and sensitive to mercury and such have significant effects.   In a group of medical students tested by patch test, 13 % were sensitive to mercury(20).  The mercury sensitized students were found to have more than average number of amalgam fillings, higher hair mercury than non-sensitized students, and more allergic reactions to other things such as cosmetics, soaps, shampoos, etc.   Many other studies have found similar levels of sensitization in recent years, with those populations with higher exposures such as those with many fillings or dental staff tending to have higher levels of sensitization(17-19) and more adverse health effects.   In a group of 8 with contact eczema patch tested for mercury in Spain, all were positive for mercurochrome, six to inorganic mercury, and some to thimerosal(21).  This study like several others noted the danger in patch tests for mercury as 2 of the patients suffered anaphylactic shock after the patch test due to the extreme immune reactivity of some to mercury.

Allergic contact eczema is the most frequent occupational disease (1,91), and the most common cause of contact eczema is exposure to metals(1, 5-14).  The metals most commonly causing allergic immune reactivity are nickel, mercury, chromium, cobalt, and palladium(5-13,18, 60,91).    The highest level of sensitization is to Infants, who are most reactive to thimerosal, a form of mercury that has been used as a preservative in vaccines and eye drops(14).   

Antigen specific LST-test was performed on a large number of patients with atopic eczema(33), using T-cells of peripheral blood. 87% showed LST positive reactions to Hg, 87% to Ni, 38% to Au and 40% to Pd   They removed LST positive dental metals from the oral cavities of patients. Improvement of symptoms was obtained in 82% (160/196) of the patients within 1-10 months.  Similar results have been obtained at other clinics(34-38).***

Dental staff have been found to have significantly higher prevalence of eye problems, conjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis, and contact urticaria(91c). Finnish dental staff have the highest occupational risk of contact dermatitis with 71% affected over time(91b) with plastics, rubber, and mercury the most common causes of sensitization.  Korean dental technicians have a high incidence of contact dermatitis, with dental metals the most common sensitizers. Over 25% had contact dermatitis with over 10% sensitive to 5 metals, chromium, mercury, nickel, cobalt, and palladium(91a).  16.3% were immune reactive to mercury.

 In asthma allergen related T-lymphocytes cause release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells, esinophils, and lymphocytes, along with inflammatory cytokins such as Interleulin-4(Il-4), TNF-alpha, histamine, and increased IgE(49i).  It has also been documented that the majority of cases have decreased serum magnesium levels, decreased NA+K+ATPase levels, and increased digoxin levels(an inhibitor of NA+K+ATPase)(49d).    Mercury exposure has been documented to cause an increase in inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-4(47,49b,49e,65a,81abc).   TNFA-alpha has been found to increase the Ca(2+) sensitivity of agonist-stimulated phosphorylation and contractility in airway smooth muscle (ASM) and increase airway hyper-responsiveness(49a).  TNFa levels have also been found to be significantly correlated to levels of the inflammatory cytokines Il-4, Il-8, Il-13 released from histamine-containing basophils which results in histamine releases and increased IgE levels, as well as  airway reactivity, and asthmatic attacks(49acfkl).  The release of these inflammatory cytokines has also been shown to be a factor in mercury’s inducement of autoimmunity that is involved in the development of airway inflammation(49g).

Asthmatic patients are especially susceptible to air pollution.  Upon contact with an allergen, sensitized mast cells release highly active proinflammatory mediators. Allergen-mediated mast cell activation is an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of atopic asthma. Epidemiologic studies found a positive correlation between severity of symptoms among asthmatic patients and the level of particulate matter (PM) in the air. Among the constituents of PM are metals and transition metals.   A Polish study(49b) observed that several metal and transition metal ions activated mast cells and enhanced allergen-mediated mast cell activation.


Metal and transition metal ions also induced significant secretion of interleukin (IL)-4 and increased antigen-mediated IL-4 secretion in mast cells. These effects of metal and transition metal ions on mast cells were observed at concentrations that do not result in direct cytotoxicity.

Genetic characteristics have been found that affect the susceptibility

Many clinics and studies involving thousands of patients have found that patients with allergic reactive conditions such as oral lichen planus, eczema, chronic allergies etc. usually recover or have significant improvements after amalgam replacement.  Of a group of 86 patients with CFS symptoms, 78% reported significant health improvements after replacement of amalgam fillings within a relatively short period, and MELISA test found significant reduction in lymphocyte reactivity compared to pre removal tests(17). The improvement in symptoms and lymphocyte reactivity imply that most of the Hg-induced lymphocyte reactivity is allergenic in nature.     Patients with other systemic neurological or immune symptoms such as arthritis, myalgia, OLP, MCS, MS, etc. also often recover after amalgam replacement(15-18).     Cases of documented clinical cases with recovery after amalgam replacement include:

 eczema and contact dermatitis(22,33,34,52-54,16b,99),  psoriasis(33-36, 99), asthma(50,52,72,99),

lupus(16b,27,33,70,71,31,18),allergies(22,31,32,43,48,49,52,53,66-74,99),  chronic multiple chemical sensitivities (32,52,70,71,73,75-77,17,31),

Oral lichen planus (15,16,39-43),   CFS (17,31,33,52-54,66,70,71,75,84,85)

and muscular/joint pain/fibromyalgia (17,31,53,72,84)  MS(16b,31,99) ***

     As an example of experience of those with allergic conditions after amalgam replacement, a German study(52) followed a large group of patients. Over 50% followed indicated they experienced significant improvement after amalgam replacement for 5 chronic conditions followed:  asthma, chronic bronchitis, polymyosis, eczema, contact allergy and food allergy.  The study showed that skin allergy(patch) test apparently is not a reliable indicator of those with mercury related health problems. Patch test was positive in only 13.1 % of patients, whereas more than 50% of patients had significant health improvement for most conditions followed.***

 

                        References

(1) National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, (U.S.), National Institutes of Health, April, 2003;      www.niams.nih.gov/hi/topics/dermatitis/index.html#link_b

& Rudikoff D and Lebwohl M. "Atopic dermatitis." Lancet 351(9117): 1715-21. 1998.

(2) U.S. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health Statistics, Asthma Prevalence, Health Care Use and Mortality, 2000-2001, www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/asthma/asthma.htm

(3) American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI). The Allergy Report: Science Based Findings

        on the Diagnosis & Treatment of Allergic Disorders, 1996-2001;  www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/allergystat.htm

 & (b) The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee. "Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC." Lancet 351: 1225-32. 1998.


&(c) U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Fast Stats A-Z, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 10, no. 200, Table 57. 1996. Web:        www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_200.pdf.

& (d) U.S. CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Lupus Fact Sheet,              www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs020503.htm

(4) Stephen Redd, Chief, Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch, National Center for Environmental Health,   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),  Asthma in the United States: Burden and Current Theories,  Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements Volume 110, Number 4, August 2002.

(5) Romaguera C, Vilaplana J.  Contact dermatitis in children: 6 years experience. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39(6): 277-80.

(6) Xue C, He Z, Zhang H, Li S.   Study on the contact allergen in patients with dermatitis and eczema.   Wei Sheng Yen Chiu 1997, 26(5): 296-8.

(7)  Nakada T, Higo N, Iijima M, Nakayama H, Maibach HI. Contact Dermatitis. 1997 May;36(5):237-9.;

(8)  Brasch J, Geier J, Schnuch A.   Differentiated contact allergy lists serve in quality improvement.  Hautarzt 1998; 49(3): 184-91;

(9) Schafer T, Bohler E, et al, Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults.  Allergy. 2001 Dec;56(12):1192-6.

(10) Meding B, Jarvholm B.  Hand eczema in Swedish adults and children -  J Invest Dermatol 2002 Apr;118(4):719-23;

(11) Guo YL, Wang BJ, Lee JY, Chou SY.  Occupational hand dermatoses of hairdressers in Tainan City.  Occup Environ Med. 1994 Oct;51(10):689-92

(12) Sun CC.  Allergic contact dermatitis of the face from contact with nickel and ammoniated mercury.  Contact Dermatitis 1987, 17(5):306-9; & [Allergic contact dermatitis][Article in Polish] Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2003 Jun;14(84):605-8. Gliński W;

(13) Lindemayr H, Drobil M, .[Eczema of the lower leg and contact allergy]  [German]  Hautarzt. 1985 36(4): 227-31.

(14) Patrizi A, Rizzoli L, Vincenzi C, Trevisi P, Tosti A.   Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children.  Contact Dermatitis, 1999, 40(2): 94-7.

& Manzini BM, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, Donini M, Sedernari S.  Contact sensitization in children.  Pediatr Dermatol 1998; 15(1): 12-17.    

& Forstrom L, Hannuksela M, Kousa M, Lehmuskallio E.  Merthiolate hypersensitivity and vaccination. Contact Dermatitis. 1980 Jun;6(4):241-5.

  & Audicana MT, Munoz D, del Pozo MD, Fernandez E, Gastaminza G, Fernandez de Corres L.      Allergic contact dermatitis from mercury antiseptics and derivatives: study protocol of tolerance to intramuscular injections of thimerosal.     Am J Contact Dermat. 2002 Mar;13(1):3-9.;

(15) Koizumi A et al, Mercury poisoning as cause of smelter disease. Lancet 1994; 343(8910): 1411-2.

(16) V.D.M.Stejskal et al, “Mercury-specific Lymphocytes: an indication of  mercury allergy in   man”, J. Of Clinical Immunology, 1996, Vol 16(1);31-40.   www.melisa.org; & (b)Prochazkova J, Sterzl I, Kucerova H, Bartova J, Stejskal VD; The beneficial effect of amalgam replacement on health in patients with autoimmunity. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Jun;25(3):211-8.   www.melisa.org

(17)      Stejskal VDM, Danersund A, Lindvall A, Hudecek R, Nordman V, Yaqob A et al. Metal- specific memory lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man.  Neuroendocrinology Letters, 1999; 20: 289-98.  http://www.melisa.org/chronic-fatigue-syndrome.php

(18) Jenny Stejskal, Vera Stejskal. The role of metals in autoimmune diseases and the link to neuroendocrinology  Neuroendocrinology Letters, 20:345‑358, 1999.

(19) Valentine-Thon E, Schiwara HW, Validity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testing; Neuroendocrinol Lett, 2003, Feb-Apr, 24(1-2): 57-64.


(20) Mori T, Hirai T, Tomiyama T, Iida K, Miyakoshi S, Sato K, Kusaka Y, Yanagihara M, Ueda K, Mercury sensitization induced by environmental exposure.  Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 1998 Jan;52(4):661‑6 .

(21) Galindo PA, Feo F, Fernadez F.  Mercurochrome allergy: immediate and delayed hypersensity.  Allergy 1997; 52(11): 1138-41.

(22) Redhe O, Pleva J.  Recovery from asthma and allergies after removal of dental amalgam fillings.  Int J of Risk & Safety in Medicine 1994; 4:229-236.

(28) (a)P.E. Bigazzi, “Autoimmunity and Heavy Metals”, Lupus, 1994; 3: 449-453;

&(b) Pollard KM, Pearson Dl, Hultman P.  Lupus-prone mice as model to study xenobiotic-induced autoimmunity.  Envriron Health Perspect 1999; 107(Suppl 5): 729-735;

 & (c)Nielsen JB; Hultman P.  Experimental studies on genetically determined susceptibility to mercury‑induced autoimmune response.   Ren Fail 1999 May‑Jul;21(3‑4):343‑8;

& (d)Hultman P, Enestrom S, Mercury induced antinuclear antibodies in mice,  Clinical and Exper Immunology, 1988, 71(2): 269-274;

(29)   (a)C.Gordon et al, “Abnormal sulphur oxidation in systemic lupus erythrmatosus(SLE)”, Lancet, 1992,339:8784,25-6;

& (b)P.Emory et al, “Poor sulphoxidation in patients with rheumatoid arthitis”, Ann Rheum Dis, 1992,  51:3,318-20; & (c)P.Emory et al, Br J Rheumotol, 1992, 31:7,449-51;

 &(d)  Wilkinson LJ, Waring RH.  Cysteine dioxygenase: modulation of expression in human cell lines by cytokines and control of sulphate production.  Toxicol In Vitro. 2002 Aug;16(4):481-3;

(30)(a)S.A. McFadden, “Xenobiotic metabolism and adverse environmental response: sulfur-dependent detox

pathways”,Toxicology, 1996, 111(1-3):43-65;  & 

 (b)Markovich et al,  "Heavy metals (Hg,Cd) inhibit the activity of the liver and kidney sulfate transporter Sat‑1", Toxicol  Appl Pharmacol, 1999,154(2):181‑7;

&(c) Alberti A, Pirrone P, Elia M, Waring RH, Romano C.  Sulphation deficit in “low-functioning” autistic children. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 46(3):420-4;

& (d)Quig D, Doctors Data Lab,"Cysteine  metabolism  and metal  toxicity", Altern Med Rev,    1998;3:4, p262‑270,

& (e) J.de  Ceaurriz et al, Role of gamma‑glutamyltraspeptidase (GGC) and extracellular glutathione in dissipation of inorganic mercury",J Appl Toxicol,1994, 14(3): 201‑;   

(31) Huggins HA, Levy,TE, Uniformed Consent: the hidden dangers in dental care, 1999, Hampton Roads       Publishing Company Inc;   & (c) Huggins, HA,  Solving the MS Mystery: Help, hope and recovery, 2002;

(32)Barnett JH,  Discoid lupus erythematosus exacerbated by contact dermatitis.   Cutis 1990 Nov;46(5):430‑2    (nickel & lupus); & (b) Schultz JC, Connelly E, Glesne L, Warshaw EM. Cutaneous and oral eruption from oral exposure to nickel in dental braces.   Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;15(3):154-7; &  Genelhu MC, Marigo M et al; Characterization of nickel-induced allergic contact stomatitis associated with fixed orthodontic appliances, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):378-81; &(c)  Marcusson JA,  Contact allergies to nickel sulfate, gold sodium thiosulfate and palladium chloride in patients claiming side-effects from dental alloy components,  Contact Dermatitis, 1996 May, 34:5, 320-3

(33) P.Dallmann,”kon   nen durch Quecksilber entstehen? PeDa_Eigenverisg, 1995; & Perioral dermatitis after dental filling in a 12-year-old girl: involvement of cholinergic system in skin neuroinflammation? ScientificWorldJournal. 2008 Feb 6;8:157-63, Guarneri F, Marini H.          

(34) Kohdera T, Koh N, Koh R.  Antigen-specific lympocyte stimulation test on patients with psoriasis vulgaris. XVI International Congress of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Oct 1997, Cancoon, Mexico;

& Ionescu G.  Schwermetallbelastung bei atopischer Dermatitis und Psoriasis.  Biol Med 1996; 2:65-68

(35)Britschgi M, Pichler WJ.   Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory processes orchestrated by T cells.  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Aug;2(4):325-31.

   & Wehner‑Caroli J; Scherwitz C; Schweinsberg F;   Fierlbeck G.  Exacerbation of pustular psoriasis in  mercury             poisoning.    Hautarzt 1994 Oct;45(10):708‑10

(36)  Yiannias JA; Winkelmann RK; Connolly SM.   Contact sensitivities in palmar plantar pustulosis   (acropustulosis). Contact Dermatitis 1998 Sep;39(3):108‑11;


& Roujeau JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C, Guillaume JC, Bernard P, Lok C, Plantin P, Claudy A, Delavierre C, Vaillant L, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases.  Arch Dermatol. 1991 Sep;127(9):1333-8; & Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory processes orchestrated by T cells.   Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Aug;2(4):325-31, Britschgi M, Pichler WJ.

(37) Lindvall A, Lindh U, Danersund A, Metal Profiles in 25 Patients with Long-Term Illness. Presented at Eurotox 93 Congress   & Lindh, U. Nucl Instr and Meth B30:404. 1988  & Hallgren, R; Feltelius, N; Lindh, U.J. Rheumatol. 15:308. 1988?

(39) Wong L, Freeman S.  Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) and mercury in amalgam fillings.  Contact Dermatitis. 2003 Feb;48(2):74-9.

(40)  Ostman PO, Anneroth G, Skoglund A.  Amalgam-associated oral lichenoid reactions. Clinical and histologic changes after removal of amalgam fillings.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Apr;81(4):459-65.

(41) Skoglund A. Value of epicutaneous patch testing in patients with oral, mucosal lesions of lichenoid character.  Scand J Dent Res. 1994 Aug;102(4):216-22.

(42)  Koch P, Bahmer FA..  Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: a clinical, allergological, and histologic study.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Sep;41(3 Pt 1):422-30.

(43) Ibbotson SH, Speight EL, Macleod RI, Smart ER, Lawrence CM.  , “The relevance of amalgam replacement on oral lichenoid reactions”, British Journal of Dermatology, 134(3):420-3, 1996.

(47) (a)Noda M, Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Volkmann KR, Kaga M, Sano H.  Sublethal, 2-week exposures of            dental material components alter TNF-alpha secretion of THP-1 monocytes Dent Mater. 2003;19(2):101-5;  &(b) Kim       SH, Johnson VJ, Sharma RP.    Mercury inhibits nitric oxide production but activates proinflammatory cytokine  expression in murine macrophage: differential modulation of NF- kappaB and p38 MAPK signaling pathways.  Nitric  Oxide. 2002 Aug;7(1):67-74;

 & (c) Dastych J, Metcalfe DD et al, Murine mast cells exposed to mercuric chloride  release granule-associated N-acetyl-beta-D-hexosaminidase and secrete IL-4 and TNF-alpha. J Allergy Clin Immunol.  1999, 103(6):1108-14; 

&(e)  Hide I.  [Mechanism of production and release of tumor necrosis factor implicated in inflammatory diseases]   Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2003 Mar;121(3):163-73;

&  (f)Chen L, Nordlind K, Liden S,  Sticherling M., Increased expression of keratinocyte interleukin-8 in human contact eczematous reactions to heavy  metals.  APMIS. 1996 Jul-Aug;104(7-8):509-14.

(48) (a)A.F.Zamm, “Removal of dental mercury: often an effective treatment for very sensitive patients”, J Orthomolecular   Med, 1990, 5(53):138-142. (22 patients);

& (b)Dr. T. Rau, Paracelsus Alergy Clinic, Lustmuhle,  Switzerland, Allergies: Causes, Clarification, Treatment; Explore, 8(4),1996, www.explorepub.com/articles/bio‑therapy.html ;

& (c)  Dr. B. Shelton, Director, The Allergy Center, Phoenix, Arizona, www.hamptonroadspub.com/main/books/excerpts/elements2.html;

 & (d) E. Cutler,   Winning the War against Asthma & Allergies, Delmar Learning; 1st edition (July 9, 1997)

(49)   (a) Hunter I, Cobban HJ, et al; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced activation  of RhoA in airway smooth          muscle cells: role in the Ca2+ sensitization of myosin light chain20 phosphorylation.  Mol Pharmacol.   2003        Mar;63(3):714- 21;

& (b)  Walczak-Drzewiecka A, Wyczolkowska J, Dastych J.  Environmentally Relevant Metal       and Transition Metal  Ions  Enhance Fc Epsilon RI-Mediated Mast Cell Activation.  Environ Health Perspect.       2003 May;111(5):708-13;

 & (c)  Halasz A, Cserhati E, Kosa L, Cseh K.  Relationship between the tumor necrosis       factor system and the serum  interleukin-4, interleukin-5, interleukin-8, eosinophil cationic protein, and       immunoglobulin E levels in the bronchial  hyperreactivity of adults and their children  Allergy Asthma Proc. 2003       Mar-Apr;24(2):111-8;  

&(d) Kurup RK, Kurup PA.    Hypothalamic digoxin, cerebral chemical dominance, and       pathogenesis of  pulmonary  diseases   Int J Neurosci. 2003 Feb;113(2):235-58;


&(e)Wu Z, Turner DR, Oliveira       DB.  IL-4 gene expression up-regulated by mercury in rat mast cells: a role of oxidant stress in IL-4 transcription.        Int Immunol. 2001 Mar;13(3):297-304;

& (f) Strenzke N, Gibbs BF, et al,  Mercuric chloride enhances       immunoglobulin E-dependent mediator release from human basophils.  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001 Aug 1;      174(3):257-63;

&(g) Gillespie KM, Mathieson PW, et al,  Interleukin-4 gene expression in mercury-induced       autoimmunity.   Scand J Immunol. 1995 Mar;41(3):268-72;

& (h)Beghe B, Holloway J, et al.   Polymorphisms in the        interleukin-4 and interleukin-4 receptor alpha chain genes confer susceptibility to asthma and atopy in a Caucasian        population.    Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Aug;33(8):1111-1117;

&(i) Fireman P.  Understanding asthma pathophysiology.  Allergy  Asthma Proc. 2003 Mar-Apr;24(2):79-83;

 &(j) P.W. Mathieson, “Mercury: god of TH2 cells”,1995, Clinical Exp Immunol.,102(2):229-30.

&(k) Halasz A, Cserhati E, Cseh K.  [Role of the TNF system in the pathomechanism of bronchial asthma]  [Article in Hungarian] Orv Hetil. 2002 Mar 17;143(11):553-7;

& (l) Gorrie MJ, Qasim FJ, Whittle CJ, Gillespie KM, Szeto CC, Nicoletti F, Bolton EM, Bradley JA, Mathieson PW.  Exogenous type-1 cytokines modulate mercury-induced hyper-IgE in the rat.  Clin Exp Immunol. 2000 Jul;121(1):17-22.

(50) (a)Katsunuma et al, “Anaphylaxis improvement after removal of amalgam fillings”, Annals of Allergy, 1990,        64(5):472-75; & (b)Yoshida S, Mikami H, Nakagawa H, Amayasu H.  Amalgam allergy associatiated with       exacerbation of aspirin-intolerant asthma.  Clin Exp Allergy 1999; 29(10): 1412-4; & (c) M.Drouet et al, “Is                  mercury a respiratory tract allergen?”,  Allerg Immunol(Paris),1990; 22(3):81.

(52) B.A.Weber, “The Marburg Amalgam Study”, Arzt und Umwelt, Apr, 1995; (266 cases)

 & (b)   B.A. Weber,    “Amalgam and Allergy”, Institute for Naturopathic Medicine, 1994;    &

           http://home,t‑online.de/home/Institut_f._Naturheilverfahren/patinf.htm"   (see abstract)

(53) S.Zinecker, “Amalgam: Quecksilberdamfe bis ins Gehirn”, der Kassenarzt, 1992, 32(4):23;   Praxiproblem                    Amalgam”, Der Allgermeinarzt, 1995,17(11):1215-1221. (1800 patients)

(54) A.Tosti et al, “Contact stomatitis”, Semin Cutan Med Surg, 1997, 16(4):314-9;

(65) (a)Badou A et al, “HgCl2-induced IL-4 gene expression in T cells involves a protein kinase C-dependent calcium          influx through L-type calcium channels”J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 19;272(51):32411-8,

& (b) D.B.Veprintsev, 1996,      Russian Academy of Sciences,  Pb2+ and Hg2+ binding to alpha‑lactalbumin”.Biochem Mol Biol Int 1996 ;      39(6): 1255‑65;

&(c) Rajanna B et al, “Modulation of  protein kinase C by heavy metals”, Toxicol Lett, 1995, 81(2-3):197-203;

& (d) A. Szucs et al,  Effects of inorganic mercury and methylmercury on the ionic currents of cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 1997,17(3): 273-8;

(66)Melchart D, Wuhr E, Weidenhammer W, Kremers  L.    A multicenter survey of amalgam fillings and subjective      complaints in non-selected patients in the dental practice.  Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:770-77 (6,744 patients in 34           clinics)

(67)Ziff, M.F., “Documented Clinical Side Effects to Dental Amalgams”, ADV.  Dent. Res.,1992; 1(6):131-134;  &           S.Ziff,Dentistry without Mercury,  8th Edition, 1996, Bio-Probe, Inc., ISBN 0-941011-04-6;


(68) Daunderer M,    Handbuch der Amalgamvergiftung, Ecomed Verlag, Landsberg 1998, ISBN 3‑609‑71750‑5 (in German); & “Improvement of Nerve and Immunological Damages after Amalgam Removal”, Amer. J. Of Probiotic        Dentistry and Medicine, Jan 1991;    & Toxicologische erfahrungen am menchen; Quecksilber in der umwelf-                   hearing zum  amalgamproblem”,Niedersachsiscles Umweltministerium, 1991; & “Amalgam”, Ecomed-Verlag, Landsberg, 1995; & “Amalgamtest”, Forum Prakt.Allgen.Arzt, 1990, 29(8): 213-4; & “Besserung von Nerven- und       Immunschaden nach Amalgamsanierung”,Dtsch.Aschr. F. Biologische Zahnmedzin, 1990, 6(4):152-7. ( amalgam     removal & DMPS,over 3,000 cases)

(69) F.Berglund, Case reports spanning 150 years on the adverse effects of  dental amalgam, Bio-Probe,          Inc.,Orlando,Fl,1995;ISBN 0-9410011-14-3(245 cured)

(70) M.Davis,editor, Defense Against Mystery Syndromes”, Chek Printing Co., March, 1994 (case histories)

(71)  Sven Langworth et al,”Amalgamnews and Amalgamkadefonden, 1997 and Svenska Dogbladet,1997 (286 cases);        &  F.Berglund,Bjerner/Helm,Klock,Ripa,Lindforss,Mornstad,Ostlin), “Improved  Health  after Removal of dental      amalgam fillings”, Swedish Assoc. Of Dental Mercury  Patients, 1998. (www.tf.nu) (over 1000 cases)   (Sweden    Gov’t maintains health records on all citizens) ; & Heavy Metal Bulletin, No.3,1996 and No.1, 1999, p7,8;

&                Klock B, Blomgren J, Ripa U, Andrup B, "Effekt av amalgamavlägsnande patienter som misstänker att de lider   eller har lidit av amalgamförgiftning", Tandläkartidn 81(23):1297-1302 (1989)       .

(72)  P.Engel, “Beobachtungen uber die gesundheit vor und nach  amalgamentfernug”,Separatdruck aus Schweiz. Monatsschr Zahnm. 1998, vol 108(8).(75 cases amalgam removal) http://soho.globalpoint.ch/paul‑engel (89% sigificant improvement)

(73)   Lichtenberg, HJ "Elimination of symptoms by removal of dental amalgam from mercury poisoned patients", J Orthomol Med 8:145-148, 1993;

&       Lichtenberg H, "Symptoms before and after proper amalgam removal in relation to serum-globulin reaction to metals", Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine,1996, 11(4): 195-203.

 

(74)     F.Perger, Amalgamtherape, in Kompendiu der Regulationspathologie und Therapie, Sonntag-Verlag, 1990; & “Belastungen durch toxische Schwermetalle”, 1993, 87(2): 157-63;  

&      K.H.Friese, ”Homoopathische Behandlung der Amalgamvergiftung”, Allg. Homoopathische Z, 241(5); 184-187, &Erfahrungsheikunde, 1996, (4): 251-253;

 & “Amalgamvergiftung_moglicher”Der Naturazt,1995,135(8):13-15;;  

 & M.Strassburg  et al, “Generalized allergic reaction from silver amalgam fillings”, Dtsche Zahnarztliche Zeit, 22:3-9, 1967.

 

(75)Adolph Coors Foundation, “Coors Amalgam Study: Effects of placement and removal of amalgam fillings”, 1995. (www) & Internations DAMS Newsletter, p17, Vol VII, Issue 2, Spring 1997. (31 cases)

(76)G.Hall, V-TOX, Mercury levels excreted after Vit C IV as chelator‑ by number of fillings  Int Symposium "Status Quo and Perspectives of Amalgam and Other Dental Materials" European  Academy, Ostzenhausen/Germany. April 29 ‑ May 1, 1994; & Heavy Metal Bulletin,  Apr  1996,Vol.3,Issue 1, p6-8   (200 cured or significantly improved)

(77) U.F.Malt et al, “Physical and mental problems attributed to dental amalgam fillings”, Psychosomatic medicine, 1997, 59:32-41. (99 cured)

(78) Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes. III. Alterations in B-cell function and viability; & Shenker BJ, Berthold P, Decker S, Mayro J, Rooney C, Vitale L, Shapiro IM. Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes. II. Alterations in cell viability.  Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1992;14(3):555-77.

(79) (a)C.J.G.Robinson et al, “Mercuric chloride induced anitnuclear antibodies In mice”, Toxic  Appl Pharmacology, 1986, 86:159-169.