Immune Reactive Conditions: The mercury connection to inflammatory and
immune reactive conditions (asthma, eczema,
lupus, Scleroderma, celiac, Crohn’s, allergies,etc.) B. Windham
(Ed.)
I.
Increasing Incidence of Inflammatory, Immune Reactive Conditions
The incidence of allergic and immune reactive
conditions such as allergies, asthma, lupus, and allergic contact disease (eczema,
psoriasis, etc.) have been increasing rapidly in the United States over the
last decade(1-4).
The prevalence of asthma doubled over the last decade(4)
to approximately 31 million, 11.5% of the total population(2). At least 50 million have allergies(19%)(3),
and the largest increase has been in infants(1-4), with approximately 10 % of
infants- approximately 15 million in the U.S. with systemic eczema(1).
Approximately 12% have had chronic sinusitis(3c).
Inflammation has been found to be a major factor
in many chronic health conditions, including cardiovascular problems, diabetes,
arthritis, depression, osteoporosis, periodontal disease, joint stiffness,
chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, age-related immune dysfunction, etc. (186) Many studies have found exposure to mercury
and other heavy metals to be common causes of such conditions as will be shown
in this paper.
II. Oral
Metal Exposures from Dental Materials and Oral Effects
Exposure to metals has been found to be one of the
most common causes of allergic contact diseases (ACD) and other allergic and
immune reactive conditions. One of the
largest sources of exposure to the metals that will be shown to commonly cause inflammatory,
immune reactive conditions is from dental metals. Having
dissimilar metals in the teeth, e.g.- amalgam (mercury,copper,tin,silver), gold
alloys(gold,palladium), nickel or stainless steel crowns(nickel,cobalt) causes
galvanic electrical currents, and much higher
mercury vapor levels in oral air and metal levels in oral tissues.
(101-110,184,185). Government agencies and medical studies have found
that the largest source of mercury exposure in most people is from dental
amalgam fillings (122-130). For those with amalgam dental fillings, exposure
from fillings amounts to from 50 to 90 percent of exposure, with the average
being about 75 % of total exposure (123,125‑130). Mercury is an unusual
metal commonly a liquid at room temperature and vaporizing to a gas from its
liquid or solid states. The studies
found that mercury amalgams are unstable due to mercury's vaporization and
galvanic action (101-110), leaking mercury vapor continuously into the lungs
and saliva at levels exceeding government health standards (110,122,124,126). Dental amalgam is also a major source of
methyl mercury exposure for many since oral and intestinal mercury is
methylized by oral bacteria and other methyl donars(121,130).
The other most common sources of mercury exposure are methyl mercury from fish
or mercury thimerosal from vaccines, which is a major source of exposure mostly
for infants or those frequently receiving flu shots(113).
The amount
of mercury released into saliva has been found by large studies to be about 1.5
to 1.9 micrograms per liter for each additional amalgam filling (116),
resulting in an increase of about 1 microgram per liter in urine(125)
and even higher levels excreted in feces(128). Average mercury levels in gum
tissue near amalgam fillings are over 100 ppm, and are the result of flow of
mercury into the mucous membrane because of galvanic currents with the mucous
membrane serving as cathode and amalgam metals as anode(101,104,105,114).
Concentrations of mercury in oral mucosa for a population of patients with 6 or
more amalgam fillings taken during oral surgery were 20 times the level of controls(114).
Amalgam also releases significant amounts of silver, tin, and copper which
also have toxic effects, with organic tin compounds formed in the body being
even more neurotoxic than organic mercury.
Mercury
and other metals accumulate in the oral cavity in fibroblasts, macrophages, and
multinuclear giant cells of connective tissue, in blood vessel walls, along
nerve sheath fibres, in basement-membranes of mucosal epithelium, striated
muscle fibres, along collagen bundles and elastic tissue, in acini of salivary
glands, and in tooth roots and jaw bones(104,105). Such mercury including that
in the commonly formed amalgam tattoos moves to other parts of the body over
time in significant amounts and more rapidly than the other metals. Macrophages
remove mercury by phagocytosis and the mercury moves to other parts of the body
through the blood and along nerves. Oral
galvanism, where electric currents caused by mixed metals in the mouth take the
metals into the gums and oral mucosa, results in accumulating mercury and other
dental metals at the base of teeth with large amalgam fillings or metal crowns
over amalgam base(101-111). Such metals
are documented to cause local and systemic lesions and health effects such as
inflamed tissues, metal mouth, burning mouth, discomfort, tooth pain, gingivitis,
oral lichen planus, and orofacial granulomatosis (102-107,111,15,16,39-43,140,146-148). Most usually improve from these conditions
after removal of amalgam fillings and/or the amalgam tattoos by surgery (102,106,107,109,73b,
126,127,15,16,39-43,147). The high levels of accumulated mercury also
are dispersed to other parts of the body. Some
studies have also found persons with chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields(EMF) to have higher levels of mercury exposure and
excretion(117,118). Such fields are known to induce current in metals and would
increase the effects of galvanism..
III. Mechanisms by Which Mercury and Heavy Metals Cause Chronic Inflammatory
Conditions
Metals like
mercury bind to SH-groups(sulfhydryl) in sulfur
compounds
like amino acids and proteins, changing
the structure of the compound that it is attached to. This often results in suppression of the
immune system and in the immune systems T-cells not recognizing them as
appropriate nutrients and attacking them(78,18) with chronic exposure resulting
in autoimmunity. Such binding and
autoimmune damage has also been documented in collagen(18). Metals by binding to SH radicals in proteins
and other such groups can cause autoimmunity by modifying proteins which via
T-cells activate B-cells that target the altered proteins inducing autoimmunity
as well as causing aberrant MHC II expression on altered target
cells(81de).
Mercury and
other toxic metals cause release of inflammatory cytokines such as Tumor
Necrosis Factor-alpha(TNFa), Interleukin-8, Interleukin-4, (47, 35a,41a,186),
which will be documented to be factors in the chronic inflammatory conditions
discussed here, including asthma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Scleroderma,
celiac and chron’s disease, etc.
Studies have demonstrated that low concentrations of mercury(HgCl2,ie,
10(-9)-10(-15) M) significantly enhanced chemiluminescence, as well as
stimulated H2O2 production by polymorphonuclear leukocytes(137). These studies
clearly demonstrate the ability of extremely low levels of HgCl2 not only to
suppress various PMN
leukocyte functions involved in host defense, but also to
stimulate reactive oxygen metabolism(137,95). In vivo, these HgCl2 effects
would not only compromise host defense but also promote tissue injury via the
local production of reactive oxygen metabolites. This has been demonstrated increase effects
of factors in cardiovascular disease
and neurological disease. Melatonin,
vitamin E, and vitamin C have been found to counter these adverse effects(95a). Theaflavins from black tea, EGCG from green
tea, and curcumin have also been found effective at inhibiting inflammatory effects(186).
HgCl2
induces a protein kinase C-dependent Ca2+ influx through L-type calcium channels(65acd). The calcium/calcineurin-dependent pathway
and protein kinase C activation are both implicated in HgCl2-induced IL-4 gene
expression; and HgCl2
can activate directly protein kinase C, which is one of the main intracellular
targets for HgCl2. Inorganic mercury
exposure results in T cell polyclonal activation and the expansion of
pathogenic autoreactive anti-class II Th2 cells . These cells produce interleukin (IL)-4 and
induce a B cell polyclonal activation that is responsible for autoimmune
disease. These effects of HgCl2 appear to be independent of antigen-specific
recognition. Mercury from amalgam
fillings has also been documented to cause proliferation of the inflammatory
cytokine IL-8 (35a,41a,47). IL-8 is responsible for much of the acute
inflammation in inflammatory conditions such as asthma, gum disease,
inflammatory bowel disease (IBS), etc. (186). Theaflavins from black tea have been found to
block such effects of IL-8 and C-reactive protein(CFP),
and to have beneficial effects for many inflammatory conditions, including
asthma, gum disease, IBS, strokes, pancreatitis, colitis, cancer,
cardiovascular disease, etc. Supplemented
patients also show significantly reduced levels of the inflammation-generating
transcription factor NFkB, the cytokine-generating enzyme COX-2, and the
adhesion molecule ICAM-1(186). Digestive
problems are common and increase with aging, as generation of enzymes necessary
for proper digestion decline and proliferation of pathogenic biological agents
in the intestines increases. Such
problems often decrease absorption of minerals and nutrients and cause
increases in inflammatory processes. Supplementing with digestive enzymes and enteric
coated probiotics such as bacillus coagulans have been found to offer
significant improvement in inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid
arthritis, IBS, Crohn’s Disease, influenza,etc. (186)
Na(+),K(+)-ATPase is a transmembrane protein that
transports sodium and potassium ions across cell membranes during an activity
cycle that uses the energy released by ATP hydrolysis. Mercury, nickel, aluminum, and other toxic metals are documented
to inhibit Na(+),K(+)-ATPase function at very low levels of exposure(94,97,65).
Studies have found that in asthma, lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Scleroderma,
celiac/chron’s/IBS, and eczema cases there was a reduction in serum magnesium
and red blood cell(RBC) membrane Na(+)-K+ ATPase activity and an elevation in
plasma serum digoxin (87-90,65). The activity of some free-radical scavenging
enzymes, concentration of glutathione decreased significantly, while the
concentration of serum lipid peroxidation products and nitric oxide
increased. The inhibition of Na+-K+
ATPase can contribute to increase in intracellular calcium and decrease in magnesium,
which can result in 1) defective neurotransmitter transport mechanism, 2)
neuronal degeneration and apoptosis, 3) mitochondrial dysfunction, 4) defective
golgi body function and protein processing dysfunction. It is documented that mercury and toxic
metals are common causes of these conditions
(22,30,29,47-50,65,87-90,95,96,98,28,etc.) Also that they
have synergistic effects.
A study
found that 39% of a group of chron’s disease patients tested were immune
reactive to nickel (100). Nickel is the most common cause of ACD, approx. 20%
of total. Nickel (Ni), chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co)
as ions and
compounds, are well recognized skin sensitizers. Cobalt positive reactions are
associated with nickel sulphate and/or potassium dichromate sensitivity
[184,185]. In 2594 subjects, Co sensitivity was seen in association with positive
reactions to Ni and Cr in 95.2% of cases [185]. Patients tested to Co, Cr and
Ni, sensitized to any one of the metals had significantly higher odds of
sensitization to an additional metal [184].
Gold was found to be the sixth most
frequent cause of positive patch test reactions in the U.S. [151]. Similar
prevalence was observed in Europe and Japan. In a large Swedish study, 8.6% of
832 patients with suspected contact allergy on routine patch testing gave a
positive response with gold sodium thiosulfate (GST). Other patients with
contact allergy to GST also gave positive reactions to potassium dicyanoaurate,
but were negative to gold sodium thiomalate (GSTM) and metallic Au [152]. These
findings were confirmed by another group of investigators, who found that 4.6%
of 278 patients in United Kingdom had positive reactions to GST on routine
testing [153]. All of these patients were females, with a mean age of 37 years
and
the
most frequent site of eczema was the head and neck. In Japan, 8.4% of 653
patients tested from 1990 to 2001 showed a positive reaction to gold chloride,
and also in this work significantly more women (10.2%) than men (0.8%) reacted
[154]. A study by Bruze et al.
reported that a large percentage of the patch tests was
long lasting, and 35% developed late reactions [155]. In a number of cases,
positive test sites were seen to remain negative after 3 days, but to turn
positive by day 7. These findings emphasize the necessity of a second patch
test reading at a distance of 1 week, at least [156, 157].
Gold salt therapy, restorative
materials in dentistry, orthopedic appliances and jewellery are the most
accepted causes for Au ACD. Medical ractitioners have long recognized the
adverse effects, including ACD, in the risk-benefit
balance
of the usage of Au in anti-inflammatory therapy. In particular, an increasing
incidence of delayed skin reactions has been noted since the introduction of
GST and GSTM in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Allergy to Au was seen in
more than 50% of patients so treated, as indicated by patch testing with GSTM
[158]. Patients developed dermatitis, stomatitis, and eosinophilia, and less
commonly immunecomplex glomerulonephritis, lymphadenopathy, antinuclear antibody,
increased serum IgE and other blood disorders.
Gold-based dental restoration appeared
to be an important risk factor for Au ACD. Several Authors have found that a
positive patch test to Au is significantly correlated with Au dental
restorations [160,161]. The saliva may slowly dissolve Au and transport it
through the mucous membranes into the bloodstream [159] and the amount of
dental Au has been found to be correlated qualitatively and quantitatively to
the blood level of Au [162,163]. Oral lichenoid mucositis, clinically and
histologically similar to oral lichen planus, were observed at sites directly
adjacent to Au dental restorations.
A study of Yiannias et al.
retrospectively reviewed 46 patients with oral lichenoid lesions who had also
been patch tested; 2 patients who were sensitized only to Au showed marked
clinical improvement with removal of their dental Au restorations [164].
Hypersensitivity to Au has been reported
in students
involved in the manufacture of prosthetic materials in a dental clinic in
Japan, and 3 of 12 individuals tested had positive reactions to sodium
thiosulfatoaurate [165]. Moreover, implanting a
Au-plated stent seemed to represent a risk of sensitizing the patients to Au.
In the stent
group,
45.5% of patients had a contact dermatitis to Au while in the control group,
20.0% of subjects reacted and this difference was significant [166].
]. Lymphocyte proliferation in vitro shows good correlation to allergic
epicutaneous
test reactions to Au [167, 168].
There are several reports on palladium
(Pd) sensitivity associated with exposure to Pd containing dental restorations
[171-175]. Symptoms observed included signs of contact dermatitis, stomatitis,
mucositis, and oral lichen planus. General symptoms like swelling of the lips
and cheeks, dizziness, asthma, chronic urticaria, and other symptoms have also
been reported. In some case reports, complaints disappeared
after replacement with Pd-free (or metal-free) constructions. Another
aspect of Pd2+ sensitization is its frequent specific cross-sensitization with
nickel [176-178]. During a 10-year period, the trend of sensitization to Pd in
a clinic population increased to a maximum of 9.7% in the year 2000, with a
higher percentage in females than in males. Of Pd-sensitized patients, 40.5%
complained of hand dermatitis, 47.4% complained of body dermatitis, and 1.7%
complained of burning mouth syndrome [169]. The similarities in chemistry of
Ni2+ and Pd2+ support the idea of a similar mechanism involving common protein
binding sites and conformational alterations [179]. A study with 10,000 participants tested with about 25 allergens,
confirmed that of all patients 5.4% reacted to palladium dichloride alone,
whereas all other patients also had a positive reaction to nickel sulphate
[180]. There are also reports of
allergic reactions from nondermatological causes such as glasses frames (181-183).
Titanium
has also been found to be a common immune sensitizer. It has been proposed that
the optimized version of LLT, i.e., MELISA, had a greater potentiality in
diagnosing hypersensitivity to Ti. In a recent study, 56 patients chronically
exposed to Ti via dental
or endoprosthetic implants presented clinical symptoms and were subjected to
the MELISA test against 10 metals including Ti. Of the 56 patients tested, 21
(37.5%) were positive to Ti. On the contrary, when patients were patch-tested,
all resulted to be negative to Ti. Following removal of the implants, patients
showed remarkable clinical improvement [145].
Studies have also found mercury and
lead cause autoantibodies to neuronal proteins and neurofilaments, (18,79ag,80,82). The
thymus gland plays a significant part in the establishment of the immune system
and lymphatic system from the 12th week of gestation until
puberty. Inhibition of thymus function
can thus affect proper development of the immune and lymphatic systems. Lymphocyte differentiation, maturation and
peripheral functions are affected by the thymic protein hormone thymulin.
Mercury at very low concentrations has been seen to impair some lymphocytic
functions causing subclinical manifestations in exposed workers. Animal studies
have shown mercury significantly inhibits thymulin production at very low
micromolar levels of exposure(131). The metal allergens mercuric chloride and
nickel sulfate were found to stimulate DNA synthesis of both immature and
mature thymocytes at low levels of exposure, so chronic exposure can have long
term effects(132).
Nickel in stainless steel braces and crowns is a source of reactivity
and autoimmunity along with gold and palladium in crowns(32bc,16-18) Also,
micromolar levels of mercuric ions specifically blocked synthesis of ribosomal
RNA, causing fibrillarin relocation from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm in
epithelial cells as a consequence of the
blockade of ribosomal RNA synthesis(133,81e).
This appears to be a factor in deregulation of basic cellular events and
in autoimmunity caused by mercury.
There were specific immunotoxic and biochemical alterations in lymphoid
organs of mice treated at the lower doses of mercury. The immunological defects
were consistent with altered T-cell function as evidenced by decreases in both
T-cell mitogen and mixed leukocyte responses.
Mercury caused increased
immunoreactivity for glial fibrillary protein at 1 nanamole (0.2 ppb)
concentration, and
microglial response at even lower levels(134). There was a particular association between
the T-cell defects and inhibition of thymic pyruvate kinase, the rate-limiting
enzyme for glycolysis(135). Pyruvate and glycolysis problems are often
seen in mercury toxic children being treated for autism(136).
One
mechanism of mercury’s affect on contact sensitivities is the inhibition of
glutathione S- transferase(92), which is a modulator
of inflamation. Mercury also causes intestinal damage and leaky gut, causing
metabolic damage and increasing food sensitivities(93,187). Inorganic mercury was found to be a cause of
systemic eczema and digestive problems by a Japanese study(15).
Many
studies including patch tests and immune reactivity tests have been carried out
to assess the level of mercury sensitivity in different populations. They have found that there is a
significant portion of the population that are reactive and sensitive to
mercury and such have significant effects.
In a group of medical students tested by patch test, 13 % were sensitive
to mercury(20).
The mercury sensitized students were found to have more than average
number of amalgam fillings, higher hair mercury than non-sensitized students,
and more allergic reactions to other things such as cosmetics, soaps, shampoos,
etc. Many other studies have found
similar levels of sensitization in recent years, with those populations with
higher exposures such as those with many fillings or dental staff tending to
have higher levels of sensitization(17-19) and more
adverse health effects. In a group of 8
with contact eczema patch tested for mercury in Spain, all were positive for
mercurochrome, six to inorganic mercury, and some to thimerosal(21). This study like several others noted the
danger in patch tests for mercury as 2 of the patients suffered anaphylactic
shock after the patch test due to the extreme immune reactivity of some to
mercury.
The 1998–2000 North American Contact
Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data base reported thiomersal to have a definite or
probable relevance in 2.9% of the patients with a positive patch test.
Thiomersal may be found in topical medications, especially ophthalmic and nasal
preparations, cosmetics, and as a preservative in vaccines and contains organic
Hg and thiosalicylate [149]. Positive patch test reactions to one or both the
constituents of thiomersal have been frequently encountered. Thiomersal
resulted to be the fifth most common allergen in patients [149]. The main target of autoantibodies is the
ribonucleoprotein fibrillarin, which may also be a target in scleroderma
patients [150]. Positive responses to
phenylmercury, a bactericidal agent in root fillings and in pharmaceutical
preparations,
were also noted in the oral lichen group but not in the control groups. Thus,
low-grade chronic exposure to Hg may induce a state of systemic sensitization
as verified by Hg-specific lymphocyte reactivity in vitro [16].
Wöhrl et al. suggested that a high percentage (15.2%)
of children sensitized to copper (Cu) was due to the increased use of this
metal in dental amalgam [141,139]. In the same way, a woman developed Cu ACD of
the oral mucosa caused by the long-term exposure to Cu enriched dental amalgam
fillings [142]. Houger et al.
observed a relationship between intraoral metal ACD (i.e., mucositis) and
pathogenesis of squamous cell carcinoma. Because of this high prevalence, Cu
was considered an additional risk factor in the evolution of cancer [143].
Additionally, a case of a woman with lesions of oral lichen planus due to the
Cu contained in her prosthesis has been reported. The change of the prosthesis made
the lesions improved [144]. In light of the possible Cu-Ni
cross-sensitization, it is unsafe to suggest to cover nickel
goods with a layer of Cu to protect individuals allergic to Ni [141]. In 30
patients known to be contact sensitive to Ni but patch-test negative to Cu, the
severity of patch test reaction to a Cu/Ni mixture was greater (p <0.001)
than to Ni alone, suggesting that ions enhanced the sensitivity reaction to Ni.
Allergic
contact eczema is the most frequent occupational disease (1,91),
and the most common cause of contact eczema is exposure to metals(1,
5-14). The metals most commonly causing
allergic immune reactivity are nickel, mercury, copper, chromium, cobalt, and palladium(5-13,18, 60,91,141). The highest level of sensitization is to
Infants, who are most reactive to thimerosal, a form of mercury that has been
used as a preservative in vaccines and eye drops(14).
Antigen specific LST-test was
performed on a large number of patients with atopic eczema(33),
using T-cells of peripheral blood. 87% showed LST positive reactions to Hg, 87%
to Ni, 38% to Au and 40% to Pd They removed LST positive dental metals from the oral
cavities of patients. Improvement of symptoms was obtained in 82% (160/196) of
the patients within 1-10 months. Similar
results have been obtained at other clinics(34-38).***
Dental staff have been found to have
significantly higher prevalence of eye problems, conjunctivitis, atopic
dermatitis, and contact urticaria(91c). Finnish dental
staff have the highest occupational risk of contact dermatitis with 71%
affected over time(91b) with plastics, rubber, and
mercury the most common causes of sensitization. Korean dental technicians have a high
incidence of contact dermatitis, with dental metals the most common
sensitizers. Over 25% had contact dermatitis with over 10% sensitive to 5
metals, chromium, mercury, nickel, cobalt, and palladium(91a). 16.3% were immune reactive to mercury.
In asthma allergen related T-lymphocytes cause
release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells, esinophils, and lymphocytes,
along with inflammatory cytokins such as Interleulin-4(Il-4), TNF-alpha,
histamine, and increased IgE(49i). It has also been documented that the majority
of cases have decreased serum magnesium levels, decreased NA+K+ATPase levels,
and increased digoxin levels(an inhibitor of NA+K+ATPase)(49d). Mercury exposure has been documented to
cause an increase in inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha and IL-4(47,49b,49e,65a,81abc).
TNFA-alpha has been found to increase the Ca(2+)
sensitivity of agonist-stimulated phosphorylation and contractility in airway
smooth muscle (ASM) and increase airway hyper-responsiveness(49a). TNFa levels have also been found to be
significantly correlated to levels of the inflammatory cytokines Il-4, Il-8,
Il-13 released from histamine-containing basophils which results in histamine
releases and increased IgE levels, as well as airway reactivity, and asthmatic
attacks(49acfkl). The release of these inflammatory
cytokines has also been shown to be a factor in mercury’s inducement of
autoimmunity that is involved in the development of airway inflammation(49g).
Asthmatic
patients are especially susceptible to air pollution.
Upon contact with an allergen, sensitized mast cells release highly
active proinflammatory mediators. Allergen-mediated mast cell activation is an
important mechanism in the pathogenesis of atopic asthma. Epidemiologic studies
found a positive correlation between severity of symptoms among asthmatic
patients and the level of particulate matter (PM) in the air. Among the
constituents of PM are metals and transition metals.
A Polish study(49b)
observed that several metal and transition metal ions activated mast cells and
enhanced allergen-mediated mast cell activation.
Metal
and transition metal ions also induced significant secretion of interleukin
(IL)-4 and increased antigen-mediated IL-4 secretion in mast cells. These effects
of metal and transition metal ions on mast cells were observed at
concentrations that do not result in direct cytotoxicity.
Many
clinics and studies involving thousands of patients have found that patients
with allergic reactive conditions such as oral lichen planus, eczema, chronic
allergies etc. usually recover or have significant improvements after amalgam
replacement. Of a group of 86 patients
with CFS symptoms, 78% reported significant health improvements after
replacement of amalgam fillings within a relatively short period, and MELISA
test found significant reduction in lymphocyte reactivity compared to pre
removal tests(17). The improvement in symptoms and
lymphocyte reactivity imply that most of the Hg-induced lymphocyte reactivity
is allergenic in nature. Patients
with other systemic neurological or immune symptoms such as arthritis, myalgia,
OLP, MCS, MS, etc. also often recover after amalgam replacement(15-18). Cases of documented clinical cases with
recovery after amalgam replacement include:
eczema and contact dermatitis(22,33,34,52-54,16b,99), psoriasis(33-36, 99), asthma(50,52,72,99),
lupus(16b,27,33,70,71,187,31,18),allergies(22,31,32,43,48,49,52,53,66-74,99), chronic multiple chemical sensitivities
(32,52,70,71,73,75-77,187, 17,31), Oral lichen planus (15,16,39-43), CFS (17,31,33,52-54,66,70,71, 75,84,85,187) and
muscular/joint pain/fibromyalgia (17,31,53,72,84,187) MS(16b,31,99,187). Mercury has been found to
accumulate in connective tissue, resulting in lupus or scleroderma(187).
As an example of experience of those with
allergic conditions after amalgam replacement, a German study(52)
followed a large group of patients. Over 50% followed indicated they
experienced significant improvement after amalgam replacement for 5 chronic
conditions followed: asthma, chronic bronchitis, polymyosis, eczema, contact
allergy and food allergy. The study
showed that skin allergy(patch) test apparently is not
a reliable indicator of those with mercury related health problems. Patch test
was positive in only 13.1 % of patients, whereas more than 50% of patients had
significant health improvement for most conditions followed.***
IV. Arthritis
Osteoarthritis is characterized by degeneration of the articular cartilage or synovial membrane and bone next to the cartilage of knees, hips, and spine, or hand). Cracking or thinning of cartilage leads to loss of shock absorption ability and resulting thickening of bone and development of bone spurs, and inflammatory reactions. The result in stiffness and pain.
Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune condition, characterized by chronic inflammation and thickening of the synovial lining and cartilage destruction. The majority with RA have positive rheumatoid factor in serum. (186) Copper deficiency can be a factor in RA and supplementation can be helpful in such circumstances.
Arthritis is chronic inflammation of joints, characterized by high levels in the joints of archidonic acid products, which are metabolized along 2 enzymatic pathways- PGE-2 & LTB4. The destruction of bone and cartilage in both osteoarthritis(OA) and rheumatoid arthritis(RA) is related to pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFa, Interleukin-1 and IL6. It has been found that there is an excess of TNFa in both OA and RA, and some treatments attempt to inhibit TNFa. While NSAIDs relieve symptoms they do not alleviate the underlying problems and usually result in more damage to joints in the long run (186). Celebrex and Vioux are COX-2 inhibitors but do not block inflammation and damage through the LTB4 pathway, plus have significant adverse health effects. Embrel is an expensive TNFa blocker, but can also block useful purposes of TNFa such as for fighting infections and does not suppress other inflammatory cytokines. Other natural options are more effective and safer. DHA from fish oil is an effective anti-inflammatory with no adverse effects. For those for whom this is not sufficient, the drug pentoxifylline(PTX) (Trental) is often helpful (186).
As
has been seen, toxic metals like mercury cause pro-inflammatory cytokines and
inflammation, so reductions in exposure and body burden such as amalgam
replacement, avoidance, and detoxification have been found to be effective at
reducing such inflammation. Mercury accumulation in areas of sensory ganglia
and the Autonomic Nervous System has been found to commonly be a cause of such
pain and fatigue(187).
Several natural supplements have been found to be beneficial in reducing arthritis pain and damage by reducing inflammatory cytokines and. Inflammation. These include nettle leaf, SAMe, ginger, glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, willow bark (pain relief), EFAs, antioxidants, Gamma-Linolenic Acid (GLA), MSM, and curcumin (186). Inflacin is a topically applied compound that has been found to relieve arthritic pains. Nexrutine is a natural anti-inflammatory that inhibits COX-2 and has been found to be helpful, while 5-Loxin (Boswellic Acid) inhibits the 5-LOX pathway. Both can be beneficial in extreme cases.
Food allergens that can increase inflammation include grain gluten, nightshades, corn, dairy products (casein), and red meats. Fish is a preferred protein. Generally vegetarian diets with probiotics are often helpful for arthritis relief (186). Uncooked vegen diets rich in berries, fruits, vegetable, nuts, and seeds often benefit arthritis sufferers.
V. Asthma
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways, characterized by wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, mucus production, etc. At least 7.2% of the adult population has asthma and asthma in children has become much more prevalent. (186) Asthma is closely tied to immune system reactions of the humoral system, as controlled by cell signaling cytokines. Allergic antigens bind to immune mast cells and basophils, and when these come into contact with IgE antibody, a hypersensitivity response of the immune system occurs leading to inflammation and bronchoconstriction.
Current pharmaceutical treatments are bronchodilators or anti-inflammatory compounds. As previously seen, toxic metal exposures increase inflammatory cytokines and inflammation, so reductions in toxic exposures can significantly improve such conditions. Natural supplements that have been found effective in reducing asthma effects include essential fatty acids (DHA,EPA, GLA), curcumin, flavinoids such as silybin, lycopene, pycogenol, quercetin, Ginkgo extracts, licorice(coughs & congestion), Yerba mate, bee pollen (186).
Breastfeeding for at least 6 months and low levels of cereals has been found to be protective against asthma and allergies, Probiotics for the breastfeeding mother has also been found to be a preventive factor. (186) Food allergies often related to asthma include cereal grains. Other foods that produce common allergies are milk, nuts, chocolate, eggs, MSG, aspirin. High intake of red meat and fats also are related to asthma. Anti-inflammatories like vit C, E, and NAC are usually beneficial in asthma prevention. The minerals selenium and magnesium are protective against asthma. (186)
VI. Chronic Digestive Problems (Crohn’s Disease, Colitis, IBS, Leaky gut,etc.)
Crohn’s Disease: gastrointestinional tract becomes inflamed and weak. Toxic exposures such as mercury or other substances cause activation of inflammatory cytokines and/or autoimmune condition where immune system attacks intestine areas. . Reduce toxic exposures and treat inflammation. Elimination diet and avoid food allergens(dairy, gluten,eggs, nuts, fruit, nightshades, corn, red meat, refined carbohydrates). Treat candida as necessary. Good multivit/min. Lots of probiotics/ FOS, consider colonics probiotics. Repair intestinal damage: glutamine, B5, zinc, tructose oligosaccharides, vit C, fish oil. DHEA lowers inflammation. Butyrate enemas are beneficial usually.
Ulcerative colitis is where the large intestine becomes inflamed and ulcerated. Caused by inflammation, inflammatory cytokines. Treat inflammation - Beneficial treatments: fish oil, butyrate enemas, glutamine, yeast RNA, DHEA, vit K, curcumin, etc.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome(IBS): chronic or reoccurring bowel disease (abdominal fullness, bloating, flatulence, diarrhea alternating with constipation, cramps, etc. ) Often patient also has depression or anxiety.
Treatment of cramps[Regiment(Peppermint&Carraway Oil)], Treatment of Leaky gut.
Elimination diet and avoid food allergens(dairy, gluten,eggs, nuts, fruit, nightshades, corn, red meat, refined carbohydrates). Treat Candida as necessary and consider candida diet.
Probiotics , digestive enzymes, artichoke-black radish tablets, avoid sugar.
Treat inflammation: antioxidants, DHEA, etc.
References
(1) National
Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, (U.S.), National
Institutes of Health, April, 2003;
www.niams.nih.gov/hi/topics/dermatitis/index.html#link_b
& Rudikoff D and Lebwohl M. "Atopic
dermatitis." Lancet 351(9117): 1715-21. 1998.
(2) U.S. Centers for Disease Control. National Center for Health
Statistics, Asthma
Prevalence, Health Care Use and Mortality, 2000-2001,
www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/asthma/asthma.htm
(3) American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and
Immunology (AAAAI). The
Allergy Report: Science Based Findings
on the Diagnosis
& Treatment of Allergic Disorders,
1996-2001;
www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/allergystat.htm
& (b) The International
Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Steering Committee.
"Worldwide variation in prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic
rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema: ISAAC." Lancet
351: 1225-32. 1998.
&(c) U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Fast Stats A-Z, Vital
and Health Statistics, Series 10, no. 200, Table 57. 1996.
Web: www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_10/sr10_200.pdf.
& (d) U.S. CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion, Lupus Fact Sheet,
www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/fs020503.htm
(4) Stephen Redd, Chief, Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch,
National Center for Environmental Health,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Asthma in the United
States: Burden and Current Theories,
Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements Volume 110, Number 4,
August 2002.
(5) Romaguera C,
Vilaplana J. Contact dermatitis in
children: 6 years experience. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39(6): 277-80.
(6) Xue C, He Z,
Zhang H, Li S. Study on the contact
allergen in patients with dermatitis and eczema. Wei Sheng Yen Chiu 1997, 26(5): 296-8.
(7) Nakada T, Higo
N, Iijima M, Nakayama H, Maibach HI. Contact Dermatitis. 1997 May;36(5):237-9.;
(8) Brasch J, Geier J, Schnuch A. Differentiated contact allergy lists serve
in quality improvement. Hautarzt 1998;
49(3): 184-91;
(9) Schafer T,
Bohler E, et al, Epidemiology of contact allergy in adults. Allergy. 2001 Dec;56(12):1192-6.
(10) Meding B,
Jarvholm B. Hand eczema in Swedish
adults and children -
J Invest Dermatol 2002 Apr;118(4):719-23;
(11) Guo YL, Wang BJ, Lee JY, Chou SY.
Occupational hand dermatoses of hairdressers in Tainan
City. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Oct;51(10):689-92
(12) Sun CC. Allergic contact dermatitis
of the face from contact with nickel and ammoniated mercury. Contact Dermatitis 1987, 17(5):306-9; &
[Allergic contact dermatitis][Article in Polish] Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2003 Jun;14(84):605-8. Gliński W;
(13) Lindemayr H, Drobil M, .[Eczema of the lower
leg and contact allergy] [German] Hautarzt. 1985 36(4): 227-31.
(14) Patrizi A,
Rizzoli L, Vincenzi C, Trevisi P, Tosti A.
Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children. Contact Dermatitis, 1999, 40(2): 94-7.
&(b) Manzini BM,
Ferdani G, Simonetti V, Donini M, Sedernari S.
Contact sensitization in children.
Pediatr Dermatol 1998; 15(1): 12-17.
& (c)Forstrom L, Hannuksela M, Kousa M, Lehmuskallio E. Merthiolate
hypersensitivity and vaccination. Contact Dermatitis.
1980 Jun;6(4):241-5.
& (d) Audicana MT, Munoz D, del Pozo MD,
Fernandez E, Gastaminza G, Fernandez de Corres L. Allergic contact dermatitis from mercury
antiseptics and derivatives: study protocol of tolerance to intramuscular
injections of thimerosal. Am J Contact Dermat. 2002 Mar;13(1):3-9.;
(15) Koizumi A et al, Mercury poisoning as cause of smelter disease.
Lancet 1994; 343(8910): 1411-2.
(16)
V.D.M.Stejskal et al, “Mercury-specific
Lymphocytes: an indication of
mercury allergy in man”,
J. Of Clinical Immunology, 1996, Vol 16(1);31-40.
www.melisa.org; & (b)Prochazkova J, Sterzl I, Kucerova H,
Bartova J, Stejskal VD; The beneficial effect of
amalgam replacement on health in patients with autoimmunity. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Jun;25(3):211-8. www.melisa.org
(17)
Stejskal VDM, Danersund A, Lindvall A, Hudecek R, Nordman V, Yaqob A et
al. Metal- specific memory lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 1999; 20: 289-98. http://www.melisa.org/chronic-fatigue-syndrome.php
(18) Jenny
Stejskal, Vera Stejskal. The role of metals in autoimmune diseases and the link
to neuroendocrinology
Neuroendocrinology Letters, 20:345‑358, 1999.
(19) Valentine-Thon
E, Schiwara HW, Validity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testing;
Neuroendocrinol Lett, 2003, Feb-Apr, 24(1-2): 57-64.
(20) Mori T, Hirai
T, Tomiyama T, Iida K, Miyakoshi S, Sato K, Kusaka Y, Yanagihara M, Ueda K,
Mercury sensitization induced by environmental exposure. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 1998 Jan;52(4):661‑6 .
(21) Galindo PA,
Feo F, Fernadez F. Mercurochrome
allergy: immediate and delayed hypersensity.
Allergy 1997; 52(11): 1138-41.
(22) Redhe O, Pleva J. Recovery from asthma and allergies after removal of dental amalgam
fillings. Int J
of Risk & Safety in Medicine 1994; 4:229-236.
(28) (a)P.E. Bigazzi, “Autoimmunity and Heavy
Metals”, Lupus, 1994; 3: 449-453;
&(b) Pollard KM,
Pearson Dl, Hultman P. Lupus-prone mice as model to study xenobiotic-induced autoimmunity. Envriron Health Perspect 1999; 107(Suppl 5):
729-735;
& (c)Nielsen
JB; Hultman P. Experimental studies on
genetically determined susceptibility
to mercury‑induced autoimmune response.
Ren Fail 1999 May‑Jul;21(3‑4):343‑8;
& (d)Hultman P, Enestrom S, Mercury
induced antinuclear antibodies in mice,
Clinical and Exper Immunology, 1988, 71(2): 269-274;
(29) (a)C.Gordon
et al, “Abnormal sulphur oxidation in systemic lupus erythrmatosus(SLE)”,
Lancet, 1992,339:8784,25-6;
& (b)P.Emory et al, “Poor sulphoxidation in patients with
rheumatoid arthitis”, Ann Rheum Dis, 1992,
51:3,318-20; & (c)P.Emory et al, Br J Rheumotol, 1992, 31:7,449-51;
&(d) Wilkinson LJ, Waring RH. Cysteine dioxygenase: modulation of
expression in human cell lines by cytokines and control of sulphate production. Toxicol In
Vitro. 2002 Aug;16(4):481-3;
(30)(a)S.A. McFadden, “Xenobiotic metabolism and adverse environmental
response: sulfur-dependent detox
pathways”,Toxicology,
1996, 111(1-3):43-65; &
(b)Markovich et al, "Heavy metals
(Hg,Cd) inhibit the activity of the liver and kidney sulfate transporter Sat‑1",
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 1999,154(2):181‑7;
&(c) Alberti A, Pirrone P, Elia M, Waring RH, Romano C. Sulphation deficit in
“low-functioning” autistic children. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 46(3):420-4;
& (d)Quig D, Doctors Data Lab,"Cysteine metabolism
and metal toxicity", Altern
Med Rev, 1998;3:4, p262‑270,
& (e) J.de Ceaurriz et al,
Role of gamma‑glutamyltraspeptidase (GGC) and extracellular glutathione
in dissipation of inorganic mercury",J Appl Toxicol,1994, 14(3): 201‑;
(31) Huggins HA, Levy,TE, Uniformed
Consent: the hidden dangers in dental care, 1999, Hampton Roads Publishing Company Inc; & (c) Huggins, HA, Solving the MS Mystery: Help, hope and
recovery, 2002;
(32)Barnett JH, Discoid lupus erythematosus
exacerbated by contact dermatitis.
Cutis 1990 Nov;46(5):430‑2 (nickel & lupus); & (b) Schultz JC, Connelly E, Glesne L, Warshaw EM. Cutaneous
and oral eruption from oral exposure to nickel in dental braces. Dermatitis. 2004
Sep;15(3):154-7; &
Genelhu MC, Marigo M et al; Characterization of nickel-induced allergic
contact stomatitis associated with fixed orthodontic appliances, Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):378-81; &(c) Marcusson JA,
Contact allergies to nickel sulfate, gold sodium thiosulfate and
palladium chloride in patients claiming side-effects from dental alloy
components, Contact Dermatitis, 1996
May, 34:5, 320-3
(33) P.Dallmann,”kon nen durch Quecksilber entstehen? PeDa_Eigenverisg, 1995; & Perioral dermatitis after dental filling in
a 12-year-old girl: involvement of cholinergic system in skin
neuroinflammation? ScientificWorldJournal. 2008 Feb 6;8:157-63, Guarneri
F, Marini H.
(34) Kohdera T, Koh N, Koh R. Antigen-specific lympocyte stimulation test on patients with
psoriasis vulgaris. XVI International Congress of Allergology and
Clinical Immunology, Oct 1997, Cancoon, Mexico;
& Ionescu G. Schwermetallbelastung
bei atopischer Dermatitis und Psoriasis.
Biol Med 1996; 2:65-68
(35)Britschgi M, Pichler WJ.
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated
inflammatory processes orchestrated by T cells.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Aug;2(4):325-31.
& Wehner‑Caroli
J; Scherwitz C; Schweinsberg F;
Fierlbeck G. Exacerbation
of pustular psoriasis in
mercury poisoning. Hautarzt
1994 Oct;45(10):708‑10; & A
case of immediate hypersensitivity reaction associated with an amalgam
restoration, Kal BI, Evcin O, Dundar N, Tezel H, Unal I.
Br Dent J. 2008 Nov 22;205(10):547-50
(36) Yiannias JA; Winkelmann RK;
Connolly SM. Contact
sensitivities in palmar plantar pustulosis
(acropustulosis). Contact Dermatitis 1998 Sep;39(3):108‑11;
& Roujeau JC, Bioulac-Sage P, Bourseau C, Guillaume JC, Bernard P,
Lok C, Plantin P, Claudy A, Delavierre C, Vaillant L, et al. Acute generalized exanthematous
pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1991
Sep;127(9):1333-8; & Acute generalized
exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory processes
orchestrated by T cells. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Aug;2(4):325-31, Britschgi M,
Pichler WJ.
(37) Lindvall A, Lindh U, Danersund A, Metal Profiles in 25 Patients
with Long-Term Illness. Presented at Eurotox 93 Congress & Lindh, U. Nucl Instr and Meth B30:404.
1988 &
Hallgren, R; Feltelius, N; Lindh, U.J. Rheumatol. 15:308. 1988?
(39) Wong L, Freeman S. Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) and mercury in amalgam fillings. Contact Dermatitis.
2003 Feb;48(2):74-9.
(40) Ostman PO, Anneroth G, Skoglund
A. Amalgam-associated
oral lichenoid reactions. Clinical and histologic
changes after removal of amalgam fillings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Apr;81(4):459-65.
(41) Association
between oral lichenoid reactions and amalgam restorations, Pezelj-Ribarić
S, Prpić J, Miletić I, Brumini G,
Soskić MS, Anić I. J Eur Acad Dermatol
Venereol. 2008 Nov;22(10):1163-7.
Epub 2008 Apr 3; & Skoglund A. Value of epicutaneous patch testing in patients with oral, mucosal
lesions of lichenoid character. Scand J
Dent Res. 1994 Aug;102(4):216-22.
(42) Koch P, Bahmer
FA.. Oral
lesions and symptoms related to metals used in dental restorations: a clinical,
allergological, and histologic study. J
Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Sep;41(3 Pt 1):422-30.
(43) Ibbotson SH, Speight EL, Macleod RI, Smart ER, Lawrence CM. , “The relevance of amalgam replacement on
oral lichenoid reactions”, British Journal of Dermatology, 134(3):420-3, 1996.
(47) (a)Noda
M, Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Volkmann KR, Kaga M, Sano H. Sublethal, 2-week exposures
of dental material components
alter TNF-alpha secretion of THP-1 monocytes Dent Mater. 2003;19(2):101-5; &(b) Kim SH, Johnson VJ, Sharma RP. Mercury inhibits nitric oxide production
but activates proinflammatory cytokine expression in murine macrophage:
differential modulation of NF- kappaB and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. Nitric Oxide. 2002 Aug;7(1):67-74;
& (c) Dastych J,
Metcalfe DD et al, Murine mast cells exposed to mercuric chloride release
granule-associated N-acetyl-beta-D-hexosaminidase and secrete IL-4 and TNF-alpha.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999, 103(6):1108-14;
&(e) Hide I.
[Mechanism of production and release of tumor necrosis factor implicated
in inflammatory diseases] Nippon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2003 Mar;121(3):163-73;
& (f)Chen L, Nordlind K,
Liden S, Sticherling M., Increased
expression of keratinocyte interleukin-8 in human contact eczematous reactions
to heavy metals. APMIS. 1996 Jul-Aug;104(7-8):509-14.
(48) (a)A.F.Zamm, “Removal of dental mercury:
often an effective treatment for very sensitive patients”, J
Orthomolecular Med, 1990,
5(53):138-142. (22 patients);
& (b)Dr. T. Rau, Paracelsus Alergy Clinic,
Lustmuhle, Switzerland, Allergies:
Causes, Clarification, Treatment; Explore, 8(4),1996,
www.explorepub.com/articles/bio‑therapy.html ;
& (c) Dr.
B. Shelton, Director, The Allergy Center, Phoenix, Arizona,
www.hamptonroadspub.com/main/books/excerpts/elements2.html;
& (d) E. Cutler, Winning the War against Asthma & Allergies,
Delmar Learning; 1st edition (July 9, 1997)
(49) (a)
Hunter I, Cobban HJ, et al; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced activation of RhoA in airway smooth muscle cells: role in the Ca2+
sensitization of myosin light chain20 phosphorylation. Mol Pharmacol. 2003
Mar;63(3):714- 21;
& (b)
Walczak-Drzewiecka A, Wyczolkowska J, Dastych J. Environmentally Relevant Metal and Transition Metal Ions
Enhance Fc Epsilon RI-Mediated Mast Cell Activation. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 May;111(5):708-13;
& (c) Halasz A, Cserhati E, Kosa L, Cseh
K. Relationship between the tumor
necrosis factor system and the serum interleukin-4,
interleukin-5, interleukin-8, eosinophil cationic protein, and immunoglobulin E levels in the
bronchial hyperreactivity of adults and
their children Allergy Asthma Proc.
2003 Mar-Apr;24(2):111-8;
&(d) Kurup RK,
Kurup PA. Hypothalamic digoxin,
cerebral chemical dominance, and
pathogenesis of
pulmonary diseases Int J Neurosci. 2003 Feb;113(2):235-58;
&(e)Wu Z, Turner
DR, Oliveira DB.
IL-4 gene expression up-regulated by mercury in rat mast cells: a role
of oxidant stress in IL-4 transcription.
Int Immunol. 2001 Mar;13(3):297-304;
& (f) Strenzke N, Gibbs BF, et al, Mercuric chloride enhances immunoglobulin E-dependent mediator
release from human basophils. Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol. 2001 Aug 1;
174(3):257-63;
&(g) Gillespie
KM, Mathieson PW, et al, Interleukin-4
gene expression in mercury-induced
autoimmunity. Scand J Immunol.
1995 Mar;41(3):268-72;
& (h)Beghe B, Holloway J, et al. Polymorphisms in the interleukin-4 and interleukin-4
receptor alpha chain genes confer susceptibility to asthma and atopy in a
Caucasian population. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Aug;33(8):1111-1117;
&(i) Fireman
P. Understanding
asthma pathophysiology. Allergy Asthma Proc.
2003 Mar-Apr;24(2):79-83;
&(j)
P.W.
Mathieson, “Mercury: god of TH2 cells”,1995, Clinical Exp
Immunol.,102(2):229-30.
&(k) Halasz A,
Cserhati E, Cseh K. [Role of the TNF
system in the pathomechanism of bronchial asthma] [Article in Hungarian] Orv
Hetil. 2002 Mar 17;143(11):553-7;
& (l) Gorrie MJ, Qasim FJ, Whittle CJ, Gillespie KM, Szeto CC,
Nicoletti F, Bolton EM, Bradley JA, Mathieson PW. Exogenous type-1 cytokines modulate mercury-induced
hyper-IgE in the rat. Clin Exp Immunol.
2000 Jul;121(1):17-22.
(50) (a)Katsunuma et al, “Anaphylaxis improvement after removal of
amalgam fillings”, Annals of Allergy, 1990, 64(5):472-75; & (b)Yoshida S,
Mikami H, Nakagawa H, Amayasu H. Amalgam allergy associatiated with exacerbation of aspirin-intolerant
asthma. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;
29(10): 1412-4; & (c) M.Drouet et al, “Is mercury a respiratory tract
allergen?”, Allerg
Immunol(Paris),1990; 22(3):81.
(52) B.A.Weber, “The Marburg Amalgam Study”, Arzt und Umwelt, Apr,
1995; (266 cases)
& (b) B.A. Weber, “Amalgam and Allergy”, Institute for
Naturopathic Medicine, 1994; &
http://home,t‑online.de/home/Institut_f._Naturheilverfahren/patinf.htm" (see abstract)
(53) S.Zinecker, “Amalgam: Quecksilberdamfe bis ins Gehirn”, der
Kassenarzt, 1992, 32(4):23;
“Praxiproblem Amalgam”, Der Allgermeinarzt, 1995,17(11):1215-1221. (1800 patients)
(54) A.Tosti et al, “Contact stomatitis”, Semin Cutan Med Surg, 1997,
16(4):314-9;
(65) (a)Badou A et al, “HgCl2-induced IL-4 gene expression in T cells
involves a protein kinase C-dependent calcium influx through L-type calcium
channels”J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 19;272(51):32411-8,
& (b) D.B.Veprintsev, 1996,
Russian Academy of Sciences, Pb2+ and Hg2+ binding to alpha‑lactalbumin”.Biochem
Mol Biol Int 1996 ; 39(6): 1255‑65;
&(c) Rajanna B et al, “Modulation of protein kinase C by heavy metals”,
Toxicol Lett, 1995, 81(2-3):197-203;
& (d) A. Szucs et al, Effects of inorganic
mercury and methylmercury on the ionic currents of cultured rat hippocampal
neurons. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 1997,17(3): 273-8;
(66)Melchart D, Wuhr E, Weidenhammer W, Kremers L.
A multicenter survey of amalgam fillings and
subjective complaints in non-selected
patients in the dental practice.
Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:770-77 (6,744 patients in 34 clinics)
(67)Ziff, M.F., “Documented Clinical Side Effects to
Dental Amalgams”, ADV. Dent. Res.,1992; 1(6):131-134;
& S.Ziff,Dentistry
without Mercury, 8th Edition, 1996,
Bio-Probe, Inc., ISBN 0-941011-04-6;
(68) Daunderer M, Handbuch
der Amalgamvergiftung, Ecomed Verlag, Landsberg 1998, ISBN 3‑609‑71750‑5
(in German); & “Improvement of Nerve
and Immunological Damages after Amalgam Removal”, Amer. J. Of Probiotic Dentistry and Medicine, Jan 1991; & Toxicologische erfahrungen am
menchen; Quecksilber in der umwelf- hearing
zum amalgamproblem”,Niedersachsiscles
Umweltministerium, 1991; & “Amalgam”, Ecomed-Verlag, Landsberg, 1995; & “Amalgamtest”,
Forum Prakt.Allgen.Arzt, 1990, 29(8): 213-4; & “Besserung von Nerven- und Immunschaden nach
Amalgamsanierung”,Dtsch.Aschr. F. Biologische Zahnmedzin, 1990, 6(4):152-7. ( amalgam removal
& DMPS,over 3,000 cases)
(69) F.Berglund, Case reports
spanning 150 years on the adverse effects of
dental amalgam, Bio-Probe, Inc.,Orlando,Fl,1995;ISBN 0-9410011-14-3(245
cured)
(70) M.Davis,editor, Defense Against
Mystery Syndromes”, Chek Printing Co., March, 1994 (case histories)
(71) Sven Langworth et
al,”Amalgamnews and Amalgamkadefonden, 1997 and Svenska Dogbladet,1997 (286
cases); &
F.Berglund,Bjerner/Helm,Klock,Ripa,Lindforss,Mornstad,Ostlin),
“Improved Health after Removal of dental amalgam
fillings”, Swedish Assoc. Of Dental Mercury Patients, 1998. (www.tf.nu) (over 1000
cases) (Sweden Gov’t
maintains health records on all citizens) ; &
Heavy Metal Bulletin, No.3,1996 and No.1, 1999, p7,8;
& Klock B, Blomgren J, Ripa U, Andrup B, "Effekt av
amalgamavlägsnande på patienter som misstänker att de lider eller har lidit av
amalgamförgiftning", Tandläkartidn 81(23):1297-1302 (1989) .
(72) P.Engel, “Beobachtungen
uber die gesundheit vor und nach amalgamentfernug”,Separatdruck aus
Schweiz. Monatsschr Zahnm. 1998, vol 108(8).(75 cases
amalgam removal) http://soho.globalpoint.ch/paul‑engel (89% sigificant
improvement)
(73) Lichtenberg, HJ
"Elimination of symptoms by removal of dental amalgam from mercury
poisoned patients", J Orthomol Med 8:145-148, 1993;
& Lichtenberg H,
"Symptoms before and after proper amalgam removal in relation to
serum-globulin reaction to metals", Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine,1996, 11(4): 195-203.
(74) F.Perger,
Amalgamtherape, in Kompendiu der Regulationspathologie und Therapie,
Sonntag-Verlag, 1990; & “Belastungen durch toxische Schwermetalle”, 1993,
87(2): 157-63;
& K.H.Friese, ”Homoopathische Behandlung der Amalgamvergiftung”, Allg.
Homoopathische Z, 241(5); 184-187, &Erfahrungsheikunde, 1996, (4): 251-253;
& “Amalgamvergiftung_moglicher”Der
Naturazt,1995,135(8):13-15;;
& M.Strassburg et al, “Generalized allergic reaction
from silver amalgam fillings”, Dtsche Zahnarztliche Zeit, 22:3-9, 1967.
(75)Adolph Coors Foundation, “Coors Amalgam Study: Effects of placement
and removal of amalgam fillings”, 1995. (www) &
Internations DAMS Newsletter, p17, Vol VII, Issue 2, Spring
1997. (31 cases)
(76)G.Hall, V-TOX, Mercury levels excreted after Vit C IV as chelator‑
by number of fillings Int Symposium
"Status Quo and Perspectives of Amalgam and Other Dental Materials"
European Academy, Ostzenhausen/Germany.
April 29 ‑ May 1, 1994; & Heavy Metal Bulletin, Apr
1996,Vol.3,Issue 1, p6-8 (200
cured or significantly improved)
(77) U.F.Malt et al, “Physical and mental problems attributed to dental
amalgam fillings”, Psychosomatic medicine, 1997, 59:32-41. (99 cured)
(78) Immunotoxic
effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes. III.
Alterations in B-cell function and viability; & Shenker BJ, Berthold P, Decker S, Mayro J, Rooney C, Vitale L, Shapiro
IM. Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and
monocytes. II. Alterations in cell viability.
Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1992;14(3):555-77.
(79) (a)C.J.G.Robinson et al, “Mercuric chloride induced
anitnuclear antibodies In mice”, Toxic
Appl Pharmacology, 1986, 86:159-169.
&(b) P.Andres,
IgA-IgG disease in the intestines of
rats ingesting HgCl”, Clin Immun
Immunopath, 30:488-494, 1984;
&(c) F.Hirsch et al, J Immun.,136(9), 3272-3276,
1986
& (d)J.Immun.,136(9):3277-3281; &
(e)J Immun., 137(8),1986,2548-
& (f)Cossi et al, “Beneficial effect of human therapeutic IV-Ig
in mercury induced autoimmune disease”
Clin Exp Immunol, Apr, 1991;
& (g) El-Fawai HA,
Waterman SJ, De Feo A, Shamy MY. Neuroimmunotoxicology: Humoral Assessment of
Neurotoxicity and Autoimmune Mechanisms.
Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41(1): 60-1.
(80) Z.Annau et al, Johns Hopkins Univ., School of Public
Health, “Mechanisms of neurotoxicity and their relationships to behavioral
changes”, Toxicology, 1988, 49(2): 219-25;
(81) (a) Hu H; Abedi‑Valugerdi
M; Moller G. Pretreatment of
lymphocytes with mercury in vitro induces a response in T cells from genetically determined low‑responders
and a shift of the interleukin profile.
Immunology 1997 Feb;90(2):198‑204;
& (b) Hu H; Moller G;
Abedi‑Valugerdi M. Major
histocompatibility complex class II antigens are required for both cytokine
production and proliferation induced by mercuric chloride in vitro.
J Autoimmun 1997 Oct;10(5):441‑6;
& (c) Hu H; Moller G;
Abedi‑Valugerdi M. Mechanism of
mercury‑induced autoimmunity: both T helper 1‑ and T helper 2‑type
responses are involved. Immunology 1999
Mar;96(3):348‑57;
& (d) HultmanP, Johansson U, Turley SJ;
Adverse immunological effects and autoimmunity induced by dental amalgam in
mice. FASEB J 1994; 8: 1183-90;
&(e) Pollard KM, Lee
DK, Casiano CA; The autoimmunity-inducing xenobiotic mercury interacts with the
autoantigen fibrillarin and modifies its molecular structure and antigenic
properties. J Immunol 1997; 158: 3421-8;
& (f) Abedi-Valugerdi M, Hansson M, Moller G., "Genetic control of resistance to
mercury-induced immune/autoimmune activation", Scand J Immunol,
54(1-2):190-7 (Jul-Aug 2001)
(82) Wilder
RL. Neuroendocrine-immune
system interactions and autoimmunity.
Annu Rev Immunol 1995; 13:307-38.
(84) Kidd RF. Results of dental amalgam
removal and mercury detoxification.
Altern Ther Health Med 2000 Jul;6(4):49‑55.
(85) H.Huggins,Burton Goldberg, & Editors of Alternative Medicine
Digest,Chronic Fatigue Fibromyalgia
& Environmental Illness, Future Medicine Publishing, Inc, 1998, p197-; & U.Dorffer, “Anorexia Hydragyra: ...”,
Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd., 1989, 137(8): 472.
(87) (a)Overzet
K, Gensler TJ, et al; Small nucleolar
RNP Scleroderma autoantigens associate
with phosphorylated serine/arginine splicing factors during
apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum 2000 Jun;43(6):1327‑36;
&(b)
Mayes MD. Epidemiologic studies of
environmental agents and systemic autoimmune diseases. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Oct;107
Suppl 5:743-8; &(c) Bigazzi PE. Metals and kidney autoimmunity. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Oct;107
Suppl 5:753-65
(88) (a)Feighery L, Collins C, Feighery C, Mahmud N, Coughlan G,
Willoughby R, Jackson J. Anti-transglutaminase antibodies and the serological
diagnosis of coeliac disease. Br J
Biomed Sci. 2003;60(1):14-8;
& (b)Kurup RK, Kurup PA. Hypothalamic
digoxin, cerebral chemical dominance, and regulation of
gastrointestinal/hepatic function. Int J Neurosci. 2003 Jan;113(1):75-105;
& (c)Kumar AR, Kurup PA. Hypothalamic digoxin and irritable bowel syndrome. Indian J Gastroenterol.
2001 Sep-Oct;20(5):173-6.
(89) (a)Kurup RK, Kurup PA.
Hypothalamic digoxin, hemispheric dominance, and
neuroimmune integration. Int J Neurosci. 2002 Apr;112(4):441-62;
&(b) Kumar AR,
Kurup PA. Inhibition of membrane Na+-K+
ATPase activity: a common pathway in central nervous system disorders. J Assoc Physicians India.
2002 Mar;50:400-6;
(90)(a) Hide I. [Mechanism of production and release of tumor
necrosis factor implicated in inflammatory diseases] Nippon Yakurigaku
Zasshi. 2003 Mar;121(3):163-73;
& (b)Straub RH, Pongratz G,et al;
Long-term anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody therapy in rheumatoid
arthritis patients sensitizes the pituitary gland and favors adrenal androgen
secretion.. Arthritis
Rheum. 2003 Jun;48(6):1504-12;
&(c) Kurup RK, Kurup PA, Hypothalamic digoxin
and hemispheric chemical dominance--relation to the pathogenesis of senile
osteoporosis, degenerative osteoarthritis, and spondylosis. Int J Neurosci.
2003 Mar;113(3):341-59;
(91) (a)Lee JY, Yoo JM, Cho BK, Kim HO. Contact dermatitis in
Korean dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Jul;45(1):13-6;
& (b)Kanerva L, Lahtinen A, Toikkanen J, Forss H, Estlander T,
Susitaival P, Jolanki R., Increase in occupational skin diseases of dental
personnel. Contact
Dermatitis. 1999 Feb;40(2):104-8;
&(c) E.C.Lonnroth et al, "Adverse health reactions in skin,
eyes, and respiratory tract among dental personnel in Sweden", Swed Dent
J, 1998, 22(1-2): 33-45
(92) (a)Muller M, Westphal G, Vesper A, Bunger J, Hallier E.,
Inhibition of the human erythrocytic glutathione-S-transferase T1 (GST T1) by
thimerosal., Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2001 Jul;203(5-6):479-81;
&(b) Lutz W,
Tarkowski M, Nowakowska E., [Genetic polymorphism of glutathione s-transferase
as a factor predisposing to allergic dermatitis] [ Polish], Med Pr. 2001;52(1):45-51.
(93) Watzl B, Abrahamse SL, Treptow-van Lishaut S, Neudecker C, Hansch
GM, Rechkemmer G, Pool-Zobel BL.,
Enhancement of ovalbumin-induced antibody production and mucosal mast
cell response by mercury. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999 Jun;37(6):627-37.
(94) (a)Hisatome I, Kurata Y, et al; Block of sodium
channels by divalent mercury: role of specific cysteinyl residues in the P-loop
region. Biophys J.
2000;79(3):1336-45;
& (b) Bhattacharya S, Sen S et al, Specific binding of inorganic
mercury to Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase in rat liver plasma
membrane and signal transduction. Biometals. 1997;10(3):157-62;
& (c)Anner BM, Moosmayer M, Imesch E. Mercury blocks Na-K-ATPase by a
ligand-dependent and reversible mechanism.
Am J Physiol. 1992;262(5 Pt 2):F830-6.
& (d)Anner BM, Moosmayer M.
Mercury inhibits Na-K-ATPase primarily at the cytoplasmic side. Am J Physiol 1992; 262(5 Pt2):F84308;
& (e)Wagner CA, Waldegger S,et al; Heavy metals inhibit Pi-induced
currents through human brush-border NaPi-3 cotransporter in Xenopus oocytes. Am J Physiol. 1996 Oct;271(4 Pt
2):F926-30;
& (f)
Lewis RN; Bowler K. Rat brain
(Na+‑K+)ATPase: modulation of its ouabain‑sensitive
K+‑PNPPase activity by thimerosal. Int J Biochem 1983;15(1):5‑7
(95) (a)
Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Valko M, Morris
H, Cronin MT. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12(10):1161-208; & (b) P.Bulat, “Activity of Gpx and SOD
in workers occupationally exposed to mercury”, Arch Occup Environ Health, 1998,
Sept, 71 Suppl:S37-9; & (c)Stohs
SJ, Bagchi D. Oxidative
mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic Biol Med 1995; 18(2): 321-36 ; & S.Hussain et al, “Mercuric chloride‑induced
reactive oxygen species and its effect on antioxidant enzymes in different
regions of rat brain”,J Environ Sci Health B 1997 May;32(3):395‑409;
&(d) D.Jay,
“Glutathione inhibits SOD activity of Hg”, Arch Inst cardiol Mex,
1998,68(6):457-61 &(e) El-Demerdash
FM. Effects of selenium
and mercury on the enzymatic activities and lipid peroxidation in brain,
liver, and blood of rats. J Environ
Sci Health B. 2001 Jul;36(4):489-99
(96)(a) Guermonprez L, Ducrocq C, Gaudry-Talarmain YM. Inhibition of acetylcholine
synthesis and tyrosine nitration induced by peroxynitrite are
differentially prevented by antioxidants.
Mol Pharmacol 2001 Oct;60(4):838-46; & (b)Mahboob
M, Shireen KF, Atkinson A, Khan AT. Lipid peroxidation
and antioxidant enzyme activity in different organs of mice exposed to low
level of mercury. J Environ Sci Health B. 2001 Sep;36(5):687-97, & (c) Anuradha
B, Varalakshmi P. Protective role of
DL-alpha-lipoic acid against mercury-induced lipid peroxidation. Pharmacol Res. 1999 Jan;39(1):67-80.
(97) (a)Effect of Chronic Exposure to Aluminum on
Isoform Expression and Activity of Rat (Na+/K+)ATPase , Virgília
S. Silva, Ana I. Duarte, A. Cristina Rego, Catarina R. Oliveira and Paula P.
Gonçalves Toxicological Sciences 2005 88(2):485-494; & Blood-brain barrier flux of aluminum,
manganese, iron and other metals suspected to contribute to metal-induced
neurodegeneration. Yokel RA. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006 Nov;10(2-3):223-53
& www.flcv.com/vaxalum.html ;
&(b) An in
vitro inhibitor of Na-K-ATPase present in an adenosinetriphosphate preparation
Charney et al. J Appl Physiol.1975; 39: 156-158
(98) Immune Reactive Conditions: The mercury connection to eczema, lupus, asthma, and
allergies,
B. Windham(Ed.), 2003, www.flcv.com/immunere.html
(99) Clinical
results of amalgam replacement in patients with chronic health conditions, B. Windham(Ed.), 2003, www.flcv.com/hgremove.html & www.flcv.com/hgrecovp.html
(100) Sensitization to nickel sulfate in patients with ileitis terminalis
(Crohn disease)] [Article in German] Schofer H, Rosenberger G, Hottenrott C,
Strohm WD, Burmester HJ, Gonnermann B, Hensel O. Zentren der Dermatologie und
Venerologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt/Main, Derm Beruf
Umwelt. 1988 Sep-Oct;36(5):157-62
(101) N.Nogi,
"Electric current around dental metals as a factor producing allergic
metal ions in the oral cavity", Nippon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi, 1989, 99(12):1243-54.
(102) Certosimo AJ, O'Connor RP., National Naval Dental Center, "Oral
Electricity", Gen Dent, 1996, 44(4):324-6.
(103) J
Pleva, "Mercury- A Public Health Hazard", Reviews on Environmental
Health, 1994, 10:1-27.
(104) Buchner A, Hansen LS., “Amalgam
tattoo of the oral mucosa: a clinicopatholigic study of 268 cases”, Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1980, 49(2):139-47.
(105) Forsell M, Larsson B, Ljungqvist A, Carlmark B, Johansson O , Mercury content
in amalgam tattoos of human oral mucosa and its relation to local tissue
reactions. Euro J Oral Sci 1998;
106(1):582-7.
(106) Weaver T, Auclair PL, Taybos GM.; Amalgam tattoo as a cause of local and
systemic disease? Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol.
1987;63:137-40.
(107)Rose MD, Costello JP. , Eastman
Dental Institute, "The tarnished history of a posteria restoration",
Br Dent J 1998;185(9):436.
(108)Arvidson K, Johansson EG.,"Corrosion
studies of dental gold alloy in contact with amalgam", Swed. Dent. J 68: 135-139,1984;
(109) Raue H.,
"Resistance to therapy; Think of tooth fillings", Medical Practice,
vol. 32, n.72, p.2303- 2309, 6 Sept 1980
(110) Pizzichini, M; Fonzi, M;Sugherini, L;Fonzi,
L;Gasparoni, A;Comporti, M;Pompella, A Release of mercury from dental amalgam
and its influence on salivary antioxidant activity; Sci. Total Environ., 2002, 284(1-3): 19-25.
(111)
Nadarajah V, Neiders ME, Aguirre A, Cohen RE. Localized
cellular inflammatory responses to subcutaneously implanted dental mercury. J Toxicol
Environ Health. 1996 Oct 11;49(2):113-25.
(112)
(113)Halsey, NA. Limiting Infant Exposure to Thimerisol in vaccines. J. of the Amer. Medical Assoc., 282:
1763-66.
(114)
B.Willershausen et al, "Mercury in the mouth mucosa of patients with
amalgam fillings", Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 1992, 117:46, 1743-7.
(116) Monaci F, Bargagli E, Bravi F, Rottoli
P., Concentrations of
major elements and mercury in unstimulated human saliva. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2002 Dec;89(3):193-203.
(117) Omura, Yoshiaki; Abnormal Deposits of Al, Pb, and Hg in the Brain,
Particularly in the Hippocampus, as One
of the Main Causes of Decreased Cerebral Acetylcholine, Electromagnetic Field
Hypersensitivity, Pre-Alzheimer's
Disease, and Autism in Children; Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics
Research, 2000, Vol. 25 Issue 3/4, p230,
3p
(118) F.Schmidt et
al, "Mercury in urine of employees exposed to magnetic fields",
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 1997, 117(2): 199-202;
& Sheppard AR
and EisenbudM., Biological Effects of electric and
magnetic fields of extremely low frequency. New York
university press. 1977;
& Ortendahl T
W, Hogstedt P, Holland RP, "Mercury vapor release from dental amalgam in
vitro caused by magnetic fields generated by CRT's", Swed Dent J 1991 p 31
Abstract ;
& Bergdahl J,
Anneroth G, Stenman E. Description of
persons with symptoms presumed to be caused by electricity or visual display
units--oral aspects. Scand J
Dent Res. 1994, 102(1):41-5.
(121) Heintze U, Edwardsson S, Derand T, Birkhed D. Methylation of mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral
streptococci in vitro. Scand J
Dent Res. 1983 Apr;91(2):150-2.
(122) Mark Richardson, Environmental Health Directorate,Health Canada,
Assessment of Mercury Exposure
and Risks from Dental Amalgam, 1995, Final Report.
(122) World Health Organization(WHO),1991,
Environmental Health criteria 118,
Inorganic Mercury, WHO, Geneva;
(123) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Public
Health Service, "Toxicological Profile for Mercury"March, 1999;
(124) Apr 19,1999 Media Advisory, New MRLs for
toxic substances, MRL:elemental mercury vapor/inhalation/chronic & MRL:
methyl mercury/ oral/acute; &
http://atsdr1.atsdr.cdc.gov:8080/97list.html.
(125) Kingman A, Albertini T, Brown LJ,
National Institute of Dental Research, "Mercury concentrations in urine and blood associated with amalgam
exposure in the U.S. military population", J Dent Res, 1998, 77(3):461‑71.
(126) H.
Lichtenberg, Mercury vapor in the oral
cavity in relation to the number of amalgam surfaces/gold/ porcelain, and the classic
symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning,
Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine, 1996, 11:2, 87-94.
(127)Barregard L,
Sallsten G, Jarvholm B., "People with high mercury uptake from their
own dental amalgam fillings", Occup Envir Med, 1995, 52:124‑128;
& Langworth S, Stromberg R. A case of high
mercury exposure from dental amalgam. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Jun;104(3):320-1.
(128)Bjorkman L, Sandborgh-Englund G, Ekstrand J., "Mercury in
saliva and feces after removal of amalgam fillings", Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
1997, 144(1): 156‑162.
(129) Sandborgh-Englund G, Elinder CG, Langworth
S, Schutz A, Ekstrand J. Mercury in
biological fluids after amalgam removal. J Dent Res. 1998 Apr;77(4):615-24.
(130)Leistevuo J, Leistevuo T, Helenius H, Pyy L, Osterblad M, Huovinen
P, Tenovuo J.,
Dental amalgam fillings and the amount of organic
mercury in human saliva. Caries Res 2001 May‑Jun;35(3):163‑6;
(131)
Valentino M, Santarelli L, Pieragostini E, Soleo L, Mocchegiani E. In vitro
inhibition of thymulin production in mercury-exposed thymus of young mice.
Sci Total Environ 2001 Apr 10;270(1-3):109-112.
(132)
Nordlind K. Stimulating effect of mercuric chloride and nickel sulfate on DNA
synthesis of thymocytes and peripheral lymphoid cells. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1983;72(2):177-179;
(133) Chen
M, von Mikecz A. Specific inhibition of rRNA transcription and dynamic relocation of
fibrillarin induced by mercury.
Exp Cell Res 2000 Aug 25;259(1):225‑238;
(134) Monnet-Tschudi F, Zurich MG, Honegger P. Comparison
of the developmental effects of
two
mercury compounds on glial cells and neurons in aggregate cultures of rat
telencephalon.. Brain Res. 1996
Nov 25;741(1-2):52-9.
(135) Dieter MP, Luster MI, Boorman GA, Jameson CW, Dean JH, Cox
JW. Immunological and biochemical
responses in mice treated with mercuric chloride.. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1983 Apr;68(2):218‑228.
(136)
Bernard S, Enayati A, Redwood L, Roger H, Binstock
T. Autism: a
novel form of mercury poisoning. Med
Hypotheses 2001 Apr;56(4):462-71.
(137) Effects
of mercury on human polymorphonuclear leukocyte function in vitro. Contrino J, Marucha P, Bigazzi PE,
et al, Am J Pathol. 1988 Jul;132(1):110-8.
(138) Sensitization to
nickel sulfate in patients with ileitis terminalis (Crohn disease)] [Article in
German] Schofer H, Rosenberger G, Hottenrott C, Strohm WD, Burmester HJ,
Gonnermann B, Hensel O. Zentren der Dermatologie und Venerologie, Johann Wolfgang
Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt/Main Derm Beruf Umwelt. 1988 Sep-Oct;36(5):157-62
(139) Metal Allergens of Growing Significance:
Epidemiology, Immunotoxicology, Strategies
for Testing and Prevention, G.
Forte*, F. Petrucci and B. Bocca,
Inflammation &
Allergy - Drug Targets, 2008
(140)
Khamaysi, Z.; Bergman, R.; Weltfriend, S. Contact Dermatitis, 2006, 55, 216.
(141)
Wöhrl, S.; Hemmer, W.; Focke, M.; Götz, M.; Jarisch, R. J. Am. Acad.
Dermatol., 2001, 45, 863.
(142) Gerhardsson, L.;
Björkner, B.; Karlsteen, M.; Schütz, A. Sci. Total Environ., 2002, 290, 41.
(143) Hougeir, F.G.; Yiannias, J.A.; Hinni, M.L.;
Hentz, J.G.; el-Azhary, R.A. Int. J. Dermatol., 2006, 45, 265.
(144) Vergara, G.;
Silvestre, J.F.; Botella, R.; Albares, M.P.; Pascual, J.C. Contact
Dermatitis, 2004, 50, 374.
(145) Müller,
K.; Valentine-Thon, E. Neuro
Endocrinol. Lett., 2006, 27, 31.
(146) Laeijendecker, R.; Dekker, S.K.;
Burger, P.M.; Mulder, P.G.; Van Joost, T.; Neumann, M.H. Arch Dermatol., 2004, 140, 1434.
(147) Smart, E.R.; Macleod, R.I.;
Lawrence, C.M. Br.
Dent. J., 1995, 178,
108.
(148) Pigatto,
P.D.; Guzzi, G.; Persichini, P.; Barbadillo, S. Dermatitis, 2004, 15, 75.
(149) Rietschel,
R.L.; Fowler Jr, J.F. Antiseptics and disinfectants. In Fisher’s
Contact Dermatitis; Rietschel, R.L.; Fowler Jr, J.F., Eds.;
Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 149–155.
(150) Kubicka-Muranyi, M.; Kremer, J.;
Rottmann, N.; Lübben, B.; Albers, R.; Bloksma, N.; Lührmann, R.; Gleichmann, E.
Int.
Arch. Allergy Immunol., 1996, 109, 11.
[151]
Garner, L.A. Dermatol. Ther., 2004, 17, 321.
[152]
Bjorkner, B.; Bruze, M.; Moller, H. Contact Dermatitis, 1994, 30, 144.
[153]
McKenna, K.E., Dolan, O.; Walsh, Y.M.; Burrows, D. Contact
Dermatitis, 1995, 32, 143.
[154]
Nonaka, H.; Nakada, T.; Iijima, M. Contact Dermatitis, 2003, 48, 112.
[155]
Bruze, M.; Hedman, H.; Björkner, B.; Moller, H. Contact Dermatitis, 1995, 33, 386.
[156]
Aro, T.; Kanerva, L.; Hayrinenimmonen, R.; Silvennoinenkassinen, S. Contact
Dermatitis, 1993, 28, 276.
[157] Möller, H.; Larsson,
A.; Björkner, B.; Bruze, M. Acta Derm.-
Venereol., 1994, 74, 417.
[158] Fisher, A.A. Am. J. Contact
Derm., 1992, 3, 52.
[159]
Hostynek, J.J. Food Chem. Toxicol., 1997, 35, 839.
[160]
Vamnes, J.S.; Morken, T.; Helland, S.; Gjerdet, N.F. Contact Dermatitis, 2000, 42, 128.
[161] Schaffran, R.M.;
Storrs, F.J.; Schalock, P. Am. J. Contact Derm., 1999, 10, 201.
[162]
Möller, H. Contact Dermatitis, 2002, 47, 63.
[163] Ahnlide, I.; Ahlgren,
C.; Bjorkner, B.; Bruze, M.; Lundh, T.; Möller, H.; Nilner, K.; Schutz, A. Acta Odontol. Scand., 2002, 60,
301.
[164] Yiannias, J.A.;
el-Azhary, R.A.; Hand, J.H.; Pakzad, S.Y.; Rogers III, R.S. J. Am. Acad.
Dermatol., 2000, 42, 177.
[165]
Kawahara, D.; Oshima, H.; Kosugi, H.; Nakamura, M.; Sugai, T.; Tamaki, T. Contact
Dermatitis, 1993, 28, 114.
[166] Svedman, C.; Tillman,
C.; Gustavsson, C.G.; Moller, H.; Frennby, B.; Bruze, M. Contact
Dermatitis, 2005, 52, 192.
(167)
Walzer, R.A.; Feinstein, R.; Shapiro, L.; Einbinder, J. Arch. Dermatol., 1972, 106, 231.
(168) Cederbrant, K.;
Hultman, P.; Marcusson, J.A.; Tibbling, L. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol., 1997, 112, 212.
(169) Larese
Filon, F.; Uderzo, D.; Bagnato, E. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis, 2003, 14, 78.
(170) Boscolo, P.; Di Giampaolo, L.;
Reale, M.; Castellani, M.L.; Ritavolpe, A.; Carmignani, M.; Ponti, J.;
Paganelli, R.; Sabbioni, E.; Conti, P.; Di Gioacchino, M. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., 2004, 34(3),
299.
(171)
Fernandez-Redondo, V.; Gomez-Centeno, P.; Toribio, J. Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 38, 178.
(172) Hay, C.; Ormerod, A. Contact Dermatitis, 1998, 38, 216.
(173) Mizoguchi,
S.; Setoyama, M.; Kanzaki, T. Dermatology, 1998, 196, 268.
(174) Katoh, N.;
Hirano, S.; Kishimoto, S.; Yasuno, H. Contact Dermatitis,
1999, 40, 226.
(175) Yoshida, S.; Sakamoto, H.;
Mikami, H.M.; Onuma, K.; Shoji, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Hasegawa, H.; Amayasu, H. J. Allerg. Clin. Immunol., 1999, 103, 1211.
(176) Moulon,
C.; Vollmer, J.; Weltzien, H.U. Eur. J. Immunol., 1995, 25, 3308.
(177) Pistoor, F.H.; Kapsenberg, M.L.;
Bos, J.D.; Meinardi, M.M.; von Blomberg, M.E.; Scheper, R.J. J. Invest. Dermatol., 1995, 105, 92.
(178)[228] Santucci,
B.; Cannistraci, C.; Cristaudo, A.; Picardo, M. Contact Dermatitis, 1996,
35, 283.
(179) Büdinger, L.; Neuser, N.; Totzke,
U.; Merk, H.F.; Hertl, M. J. Immunol., 2001, 167, 6038
(180) Kränke, B.; Binder, M.;
Derhaschnig, J.; Komericki, P.: Pirkhammer, D.; Ziegler, V.; Aberer, W. Wiener klein.
Wochens., 1995, 107, 323.
(181) Kanerva,
L.; Kerosuo, H.; Kullaa, A.; Kerosuo, E. Contact Dermatitis, 1996, 34, 39.
(182) Goossens, A.; De Swerdt, A.; De
Coninck, K.; Snauwaert, J.E.; Dedeurwaerder, M.; De Bonte, M. Contact Dermatitis, 2006, 55,338.
(183) Suhonen, R.; Kanerva, L. Contact Dermatitis, 2001, 44, 257
(184)
Ruff, C.A.; Belsito, D.V. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2006, 55, 32.
(185)
Stingeni, L.; Pelliccia, S.; Lisi, P. Giorn. It. Allergol.
Immunol. Clin., 2003, 13, 17
(186) Life Extension Foundation, Disease Prevention and Treatment, Expanded 4th Edition, 2008 & Life Extension Foundation, Life Extension, Jan 2009 (citing many studies). & http://www.life-enhancement.com/
(187) Heavy Metal and Chemical Toxicity, Dietrich Klinghardt, MD, Ph.D. www.neuraltherapy.com/chemtox.htm ; & Mercury Toxicity and Systemic Elimination Agents, D. Klinghardt & J Mercola(DO), J of Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, 2001, 11:53-62; & Amalgam Detox, Klinghardt Academy of Neurobiology, 2008